:: Site Check ::
- Started
- Last post
- 12 Responses
- freshmode
I am about to launch this today some time. (I hope)
http://www.sublinemedia.com/ivas…
Please take a look and see if you can break it or find any bugs. It's only 1 page.
Don't pay attention to the text in the iframes. It's placeholder.
I have to start working on the flash for this so I need some help testing out the site. If you guys can check it on all your browsers. We are not really worried about nutscrape 4.x. Everything else that is widely used, please try it.
The company has stats that allowed them to design for 1024 x 768. Don't get jealous now. I kept it at around 800.
http://www.sublinemedia.com/ivas…
Also, I would appreciate your opinion on what you think of the design work. I still have room for small changes, but nothing major.
fresh!
- Bluejam0
Missing a rollover state for 'solutions' in the top nav.
login button could be better placed.
- unknown0
no rollover on 'solutions'
the rollovers dont seem to be preloaded?
no link for the email.
nice, clean layout, looks a little 'derived' but so what.
:)
- ********0
scrolling areas seem like they don't match rest of layout for some reason. some buttons don't work. colors are ok, looks like 1 million other sites of it's kind
- freshmode0
Thanks for the bug checks.
None of the links are active.
The scrolling area isn't finished yet. what is there now is just place holder.
Sucks cause it is a little "derived". But, that's what they pay me for. I dropped 2 other versions.
Can you blame them? =)
word
- the_user0
looks nice.
That's going to be one heavy-ass page though. Hope their customers have some patience.
- freshmode0
The_user,
Not to heavy. The flash is going to have lots of dynamic features. A majority of the elements will be called at run time.
The page with out the flash stands at 40k right now.
The companies that view this site are on broadband. Bigger companies that deal with high end multimedia. I think they can handle the page. Not to mention that the client was asking for a site design at 1024 x 768.
It would be a bit large for a consumer site but for this site I think it will work.
From the testing I have done, load time is 2 seconds.
Did you mean heavy by the flash or the over all design?
word
- unknown0
one point. is it me or are the two main images of the unit and the box, really poor quality-wise?
- the_user0
not necessaryly the flash, just the overall layout. I wonder how many calls to the server that one page needs to render...
a lot probably.
- unknown0
ya
the image of the broadcast server thing is pretty crappy ...
you need to clean that up a bunch
- KingMob0
On a Mac w/ Safari I was noticing that everything scrolls when I try using my mouse wheel from within one of the bottom content frames. I thought that was kinda weird.
- freshmode0
KingMob,
That is a bit weird. Thanks for noticing. I wonder if there is a script that can fix that. That is a browser issue I would assume.
the image quality sux cause it is just a low quality jpeg in the flash file as place holder.
I didn't consider the amount of requests it has. I was considering making the "product" section just tables but haven't found a script that would show that roll over image of the arrow behind the text. If anyone can point me to a script that can fix that I would appreciate it.
Thanks for comments. It needs to be a bit easier to update as well.
word
- jevad0
I like it - but the iframe scrollbars aren;t quite right I don;t think....