fat or phat logo
- Started
- Last post
- 44 Responses
- unknown0
better. but i still thinking is too complicated.
1st option, but should be redesigned.....no dick.... ;-)
- jgrafx0
plus or minus. like i said. nice & abstract. so: b) at the right side. now it looks like the plastic-car-race-simulation i had as a child. I LOVE IT!
- zoiks0
thanks... will work on it some more...
question...
is it kosher to start a new thread to let people know there is a new version or something new to look at... even though it's related to an existing thread that I created, i.e. this thread?
kinda new to this part of design culture/life...
appreciated!
- unknown0
no idea....
and, (now its my peacefully nice side), dont take too seriously those jokes with dicks and stuff. people here are arrogant, but just
inoffensive....
- unknown0
it's not arrogance... it's honesty... Don't want to go to the client, and they say... hmm it looks like a johnson!
- unknown0
nope the cock wins
- zoiks0
honesty... good
Johnson...bad
- jgrafx0
hey, my last mane is johnson, do you want to offend me ;-)
*roftl*
- zoiks0
The more I look at version one, the more I have to agree with the beginning comments...
it would be a good logo for the p0rn industry... but that's not my cup of tea...
- zoiks0
wouldn't want to offend you!! ESPECIALLY if you have a mane!
;)
- zoiks0
...all in fun yo
- zoiks0
sorry to be such a newbie, but what is
*roftl*
should I get a book from the library?
- jgrafx0
SLAP YOURSELF 10000 TIMES!!!! google: ROFTL!
ROLLING
ON
THE
FLOOR
LAUGHING!!!!!!!!LESSON 1 FINISHED!
- jgrafx0
i slap myself as well, spelled it wrong in the 1st comment. must be the keyboard here... ;-)
- zoiks0
lesson learned!
(I am yet a grasshopper... a grasshopper that knows he should never ask a question without consulting google first...)
- robotron3k0
yeah, def your fat/phat cock is too complicated, you need to simplyfi more, and put the nads below so it looks more natural... is that what your trying to go for..? just a suggestion...
;)
- jgrafx0
without asking google... I DONT NOW WHAT I DID BEFORE GOOGLE WAS INVENTED! ALTAVISTA? THE PUBLIC LIBRARY!
- fatoe10
i'd focus more on the typography, here it seems you put more effort into how it's contained reather than how it's communicated or read.
i feel that's more important.
good concept, you should be able to come up with something dope.
- Bridgetown0
Basic says simple. You got way to busy. Let it read quick, dont over do it. Concentrate more on the "name" not the support characters.
good start though.