new theory of mine.
Out of context: Reply #34
- Started
- Last post
- 85 Responses
- ********0
no lesk, you're not understanding what i am trying to say. what i said has nothing to do with evil knowing it is evil. evil and good need each other in order to excist. which doesn't mean that good always knows it's good and evil always knows it's evil. it is perfectly possible that evil excists without knowing it is evil because no a) one recognized it as being evil or b) that person doesn't see it actions as being evil but as good. as a simple example: the witchhunting done by religious figures back in the days. for them it was never experienced as doing evil while they where actually doing evil. know what i mean? another example, a mass murderer with a mental disorder may be so convinced about his actions as being pure goodness it doesn't see it as evil. we say it's evil and from that point on it excists.
rabattski
(May 2 05, 03:08)Thats the point i'm trying to make.
Evil is what our background doesn't understand or opposes with.
Just one question - would there be evil if there would be no man?