Gomery Inquiry 2005

Out of context: Reply #27

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 37 Responses
  • punch0

    Yep, that's canadians for ya eh? Willing to overlook scandal, fraud and theft in the highest echelons of power for the sake of maintaining convenient, self-serving status quo. The Liberal Party is downright Machiavellian. I hope canadians don't get suckered into another couple years of more taxes, more laws and more arrogance.

    Ya know, some politically correct, superficially broad-minded canadians pay lipservice to this word "tolerance" as the most venerable canadian virtue, yet they can't "tolerate" the idea of political parties with differing views from their own legally and democratically challenging the political hegemony. This kind of close minded attitude is extremely dangerous. Rigorous unfettered debate is a sign of a healthy democracy. Or did you not know that enforced monopolicy in the political process is called *fascism*.

    As for Harper being a whiney bitch, he is leader of the opposition. Whether you agree or disagree with the party platform, it's his fucking job to bitch and whine.

    Oh ya, someone brought up Pierre Asswipe Pettigrew. C'mon, he's a crook. That HRDC scandal (so conveniently forgotten 5 odd years later) occured under his direction. Jane Stewart became the sacrificial lamb of the whole affair, after Pettigrew was moved to Foreign Affairs.

    Anyways, why the fuck I am arguing canadian politics on a design forum escapes me. So...

    The end.

View thread