BIBLE
BIBLE
Out of context: Reply #301
- Started
- Last post
- 302 Responses
- jakeyj0
ok this is an honest question. if you have a document that claims to be historical (i.e. reads like history, fact/detail/places rooted in history) isn't it supposed to be taken as true until proven otherwise false?
like you said kuz archeology hasn't proven anything true - but it hasn't proven it false either...i'm honestly asking.
i'm not just talking about the bible I'm talking about any historical document.
and kuz sorry mate, but that post was not cool.