BIBLE

Out of context: Reply #290

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 302 Responses
  • ********
    0

    first tell me how have i been selective in the Encylopedia things? You lying cunt

    What assumptions have i made of the stance of researches?

    You idiot - they are NOT FUCKING POSTMODERN REVISIONISTS!! Do you know what post-modernity means?????? eugh!!! It is not simply looking at conflicting evidence!!!! You don't even know what post modernism is you tit!

    Carefully worded name-calling? you cunt! where have i done this??? for fucks sake!! there's no talking to you. Fuck you, fuck your jesus and i piss on your bible and wipe my ass with it

    What the fuck is a Christian apologist? How am i raising an argument from silence?????? Just because of i've never met someone like you doesn't mean shit - I went to school! I watch the discovery channel for fucks sake! I read those Encyclopaedias - which i did not take out of context by the way - big fat liar.

    NOW STOP QUOTING THAT ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUFF

    I TOLD YOU

    ITS LIKE ROBIN HOOD

    JUST CAUSE SHERWOOD FOREST EXISTS

    AND KING JOHN EXISTS

    DOES NOT MEAN ALL THOSE CRAZY STORIES TOOK PLACE!!

    AND I READ UP ON ALL THOSE ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE YOU KEEP REPEATING AND I FOUND THEM TO BE CONTENTIOUS

    THE ARE NOT FACT - THOSE ARE OPINOINS AS THE ENCYCLOPAEDIAS SAY.

    I'M MERELY SAYING EVERYTHING YOU SAID IS CONTENTIOUS

    YOU DUMB FUCK

    GO FUCK YOURSELF

View thread