BIBLE
Out of context: Reply #280
- Started
- Last post
- 302 Responses
- ********0
Secondly, what exactly is a neo-humanist? A humanist and then a neo-humanist? I have merely sought reason and logic. It is interesting how, in order to justify your marginal and minority position, you need to create some sort of conspiracy theory waged against Christianity. I say marginal since, as I pointed out, I have never come across people of your ilk during my whole life in education, nor during my cursory glance yesterday at some leading Encylopedias. Your misuse of the words “secular” and “humanist” and invention of the word “neo-humanist” says more about you as a person than highlighting some actual academic argument.
Thirdly, I would wholeheartedly tolerate an intelligent position on common and old objections. My intolerance is the lack of intelligibility in your entire discourse. It seems wholly contrived, immensely selective, and reliant on ambiguity.
But to address some of the actual issues you raised....