BIBLE
BIBLE
Out of context: Reply #169
- Started
- Last post
- 302 Responses
- ********0
Wikipedia says that
"Indeed, a re-dating on the order of 300 years, as they proposed, is strongly rejected by leading Egyptologists, notably Prof. Kenneth Kitchen, although a redating by lesser amounts, such as 50 years, is more widely seen as potentially necessary."
Sorry leading Egyptologist Prof Kenneth Kitchen rejects Rohl. It's speculation then in it? And if you're speculation is based on the NEED to prove your faith.. well then, that is hardly reliable is it?