site check +

Out of context: Reply #2

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 20 Responses
  • Bluejam0

    It looks good. Works well. Clear and concise.

    Couple of things, why a wood background? What's it communicating? Plus you've had to use white boxes in order to read the copy...etc. This tells me the wood background is not suitable. Do you need a background?

    The photography section is well done but the difference in scale between the thumbnails and the larger versions doesn't work for me. I want to see the photo's larger...the shell of the site seems to impede on the content you're trying to show. The same goes for the web section, the screen shots could be bigger, cropping on particular elements rather than showing the whole page, make it fun!

    Otherwise a solid site to show yer work. Good job.

View thread