Libs & Xmas
Out of context: Reply #87
- Started
- Last post
- 157 Responses
- Blofeldt0
I'm sorry but i don't agree with you. We are approaching this from two fundamentally different viepoints.
I'd argue, that I am happy that we do not know the origin of life on earth, but rather than entertain the belief that everything was created for us and leave it at that, i'd like to find another possibility.
I believe the fundamental problem with religion, is that if people were satisfied with what religon taught them regarding the world and what surrounded them, we would still be living in mud huts.
Why work things out for yourself rather than try and improve. This is where our arguments really collied. Despite all the eveidence to contrary, that follows the same process driven analysis as other science, you believ that the eart is only 4500 years old. A claim that made Kansas the laughing stock of the world in 1929! And you're still arguing it! And what about storms, people used to believe they came when they didn't please god, but it's accepted that they are caused by weather.
I'd like to say i'd see you in heaven, but as we're just an animal, we'll rot in the ground like insects, dogs, trees and everything else.