Libs & Xmas
Libs & Xmas
Out of context: Reply #43
- Started
- Last post
- 157 Responses
- discipler0
Blofeldt, the argument is that Creationism IS scientific.
Are you aware that Evolution does not even qualify as a Scientific Theory (its neither testable nor observable)? So, its a "belief". Not to mention that it flies in the face of scientific laws, such as Entropy - II Law of Thermodynamics. What people need to realize is that the alternative to Creationsim is a faith-based belief. This is because it is unscientific to suggest that matter and cognizant life sprang from nothing. It is unscientific to suggest that species developed from one to another when there has never, I repeat NEVER been a transitional form between species discovered.