can someone explain this to me?
Out of context: Reply #3
- Started
- Last post
- 4 Responses
- xaoscontrol0
Intersting viewpoints. I was just curious. My view is similar to 1977...assuming that he was being sarcastic in an analogy.
I guess I don't understand the appeal of it. any government will always have a level of control. it seems to me that, mych like communism, it wouldn't work. I define a government that 'works' as a government that can truly say that it's defined goal is reached. I can't say that communisim works..it is a great concept...a concept that puts everyone on the same equal playing field...but that's not way happens. what belongs to the government, belongs to the government and what belongs to the indidicual, belongs to the government..no matter if you area a garbage man or a neuro-surgeon, the pay isn't that much different
I guess in the case of an anarchistic state, it seems there'd really be no system at all. I hate taxes as much as the next guy, but how else would the funding be generated in order to provide for welfare or provide a level of law?
Maybe I'm wrong...