americans overseas
Out of context: Reply #73
- Started
- Last post
- 74 Responses
- vena0
actually exador, canada's been getting on some environmentalists' nerves lately concerning their water supply, which is why i mentioned it earlier. you're using more than your producing, paying less than it costs to produce, and without the infrastructure to adequetly reprocess disposed water.
also, you guys have a reputation for having a very well trained military that's very smart. what you lack in numbers, you've more than made up for in tactics and execution. i believe you've kicked our ass in war games more than once :)
as for proof in iraq - the UN security council has been saying that they don't believe Iraq disposed of any of its chemical or biological weapons since 1996. that they had them is really of no question. 1) we gave them the original raw materials to produce them, and 2) they admitted to having them. the inspector report released this morning is pretty clear that missles far exceeding the range allowance as stated by the UN are in iraq (300 missles, i believe), and there's no evidence they destroyed anything they said they had and were required to.
now, why should sadam be treated more sternly? well, there's the whole ethnic clensing of kurds, their ability and professed willingness to use far reaching chemical and biological agents, and their continued deceit and defiance of UN disarmament requirements.