election 2004
Out of context: Reply #11
- Started
- Last post
- 16 Responses
- phist0
mrdob and company, how am i voting for bush if i am voting for nader? if you listened to the press conference that nader held when he announced his run for 2004, a lot of the nader votes came from non-democrats (republicans, independents, etc,). nader votes did not necessarily mean votes taken away from gore. al gore did not even contest the results at all, he won - he's supposed to be the president right now. shows you what kind of people democrats are, wishy washy and weak. that is pathetic, i've given up on the democratic party. kerry wants to continue military operations in iraq and elsewhere. most of his proposed policy is too similiar to bush. anyone but bush is not a good thing to go by because the "anyone" happens to be almost the same with a different name. this year will be close. but remember nader votes dont mean kerry votes, they mean people that have left the 2 parties, young and new voters and people that want a drastic change, a revolution if you will. the 2 party system is not working. look at the 9-11 commission, total bullshit - they are not gaining any ground because its centered around dems vs repubs, not around the victims, their families, americans concerned about the future.