Iran war/WW3

Out of context: Reply #463

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 502 Responses
  • ********
    17

    we’re expected to believe iran is the biggest nuclear threat in the middle east while israel is the one with a secret nuclear program that refuses inspection and compliance with law, while also simultaneously attacking 3 of its neighbours and occupying two different countries *while also* currently perpetrating a genocide.

    israel also has the “samson option” which is a pledge to launch a massive nuclear attack on literally the entire world if they ever feel threatened i.e if they’re stopped from continuing their reign of terror and expansion program in the middle east. the world is literally being held hostage by this lunatic state and the u.s is a happy participant.

    ********
    17Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • how many - if´s- and- believe- are in there.. to make a final defintion all together.. . i stopped counting.. but it sure makes a good populist argument ...neverscared
    • also pretty anti-semitic and lunatic generalization ....neverscared
    • iran threatening to wipe out israel for how long? too long..so much for announcing a genocide.neverscared
    • How is it anti-Semitic to suggest Isreal are a war mongering nation? It’s not a Jewish thing. It’s a Netenyahu thingIanbolton
    • because isreal is labeling anyone a nazi, who wants isreal to stop killing innocent people.pango
    • i´am pretty sure there are enough israelis in the streets and in their homes...who dont label it that way.... bibi although ... different thing.neverscared
    • neverscared with the assumption that critique of israel = israelis = jews yet calling other people anti semitic? gtfokingsteven
    • not really... the lunatic state thing is anti semitic...neverscared
    • Aaaaah the fresh smell of whataboutism in the morning from @son another loser that got banned a while ago for racism or antisemitism if I recall
      ********
    • ..especially when u run an argumentation style on -if´s -and -believes -and finish up with he world is held hostage...by the oh so bad jews....neverscared
    • it isn't in english. again, the bad-faith extrapolation to 'state of lunatics' you pulled out of your arse. you should apologise to the OPkingsteven
    • how the mullahs couldnt anticipate that situation.. what were they thinking ? that the world is singing hakuna matata if they wont let inspectors in..neverscared
    • what ? the lunatic state is in the last line of of wallas comment ...neverscared
    • Every Semitic nation in the middle east is a lunatic state. All 25 of them._niko
    • in english 'state' refers to the the government and its institutions (not the people, not the culture, not the land) to extrapolate that "lunatic state" meanskingsteven
    • "state of lunatics" is just insane talk. stop digging this hole and learn to read before commenting.kingsteven
    • is never wrote "state of lunatics" i wrote the lunatic state thing is anti-semitic to wallas post. .. therefore insane... u should learn to read and understand.neverscared
    • ineverscared
    • i am not in a hole... i think u are a in a misinterpret comments spiral.neverscared
    • to be clear .. i have to view that its not a lunatic state and is not a state a lunatics...and thats what i condem in wallas comment.... how that is to confuseneverscared
    • by u is mysterious to me....neverscared
    • learn to write tookingsteven
    • u have to learn how to think too...neverscared
    • because u evidently make no sense.neverscared
    • my comments have been quite clear. you have called someone an anti-semitic for using the term "lunatic state" but have not stated why it's anti semitic otherkingsteven
    • than "i have to view that its not a lunatic state"kingsteven
    • its obvious... its not a lunatic state because when u get threadened to get nuked by iran for that long its not lunatic to bomb irans nuclear capabilties...neverscared
    • therefore u blame it on the - oh so bad jews-neverscared
    • that's akin to claiming 'the USA is a lunatic state' as fat-shaming. completely insane talk.kingsteven
    • no neighbour has announced to nuke the USA.. there fore i agree to disagree... context u either get or not...neverscared
    • itneverscared
    • the bomb making mullahs and threats are anti semtic.to the core , and the walla dude seems to have no problem that they got taken out ..he really mustneverscared
    • adore the mullahs state of mind..otherwise he wouldnt....neverscared
    • a problemneverscared
    • if u think the leaders in Teheran are trying to use uncontrolled enriched uranium for s bbq ...of course the whole thing doesnt work.neverscared
    • see how this works... calling iran a "lunatic state" is not islamophobic. refering to the iranian state as "bomb making mullahs" is islamophobickingsteven
    • just as calling israeli state "bomb making jews" would be anti-semitic.kingsteven
    • ok this is getting really boring....how would u call someone then who says : Iran leader says Israel a ‘cancerous tumor’ to be destroyed..neverscared
    • its the state..neverscared
    • i'd suggest "lunatic state" as an appropriate and completely non-racist way to describe the governing entities of USA, Iran and Isrealkingsteven
    • not if the lunacy is anti-semitic....as in the anti-semitic iran leader way...who runs the state...neverscared
    • you are a mad ladkingsteven
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread