Artificial Intelligence

Out of context: Reply #1791

• Started
• Last post
• 2,577 Responses

• ********

  -1

  

  "March 18 - A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday affirmed that a work of art generated by artificial intelligence without human input cannot be copyrighted under U.S. law.

  The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit agreed, opens new tab with the U.S. Copyright Office that an image created by Stephen Thaler's AI system "DABUS" was not entitled to copyright protection, and that only works with human authors can be copyrighted."

  https://www.reuters.com/world/us…

  ********

  -1Permalink

  UpvoteDownvote

  Flag

  • this is interesting because stock sites are now full of ai images, so does that mean we're free to use any of them without paying?_niko
  • lol we can argue that, right?
    ********

  Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note

  SaveCancel

View thread