State of QBN 2025
State of QBN 2025
Out of context: Reply #22
- Started
- Last post
- 407 Responses
- Morning_star-6
An "ad hominem" argument is considered weak because it attacks the person making the argument rather than addressing the substance of their argument itself, meaning it avoids the real issue by focusing on irrelevant personal characteristics or traits, effectively diverting the discussion away from the actual point being debated.
The clumsiness of delivery doesn't negate facts.
- Preach brotherNBQ00
- Is the argument in the room right now?palimpsest
- The era of faux inquiry and dark web whataboutism has passed. The scaffolding of contrarianism cannot hold forever, JP won’t be there to catch the rubble.palimpsest
- This has very little to do with the guitarist from Led Zeppelin.Morning_star
- Although a little less Ramble On and more Whole Lotta Love would be welcome.Morning_star
- amen brother_me_
- You're the conductor.palimpsest
- there is no conductor ... we are all drifting in chaos...neverscared
- we better enjoy it...neverscared
- damn there is so much nonsense coming out of my mouth today ... its adorable...neverscared
- Get at me if you ever have a valuable argument. I'm out.palimpsest
- i hope so..neverscared
- fact is, you really are one of the dullest cunts here, by a long margin.face_melter