Coronavirus
Coronavirus
Out of context: Reply #6275
- Started
- Last post
- 6,399 Responses
- palimpsest1
@set @Hench @Rendle
Did you not tell us that ail vaxxxxed people are legally not human anymore?
Because I'm basing all my logic on this fact you told us to be true.- So you ridiculed that point the whole time, but now you're agreeing in ernest, is it?Rendle
- I'm basing all my iogic on your fact. How is this difficult to understand? I'm here for you.palimpsest
- Do you agree that vaxxxxed people are no longer humans?palimpsest
- As I said, ridicule does not bode well. Nor will it age well. You continue all you like..Rendle
- Ok. Thanks for the answer.palimpsest
- If you genetically modify an organism, it is no longer legally considered the same organism. It's basic law. Not my fault you cannot comprehend.Rendle
- Do you think you can patent and own a tomato? The answer is no. Do you think you can patent and own a tomato if you genetically modify it? The answer is yes.Rendle
- Is that genetically modified tomato still legally a tomato? The answer is no. Is it legally now considered a new organism? The answer is yes.Rendle
- I'm completely agreeing with you. I think that's what difficult for you to understand.palimpsest
- If you've taken the mRNA, are you now genetically modified? The answer is yes. It's really quite simple.Rendle
- Vaxxxxed "people" are no longer human. Can we both agree on that? Because I think we do and it's difficult for you to understand.palimpsest
- I'll post my original reply again... "So you ridiculed that point the whole time, but now you're agreeing in ernest, is it?"Rendle
- a*Rendle
- It's quite simple, as you've already stated.
I don't see where the problem is. Do you care to elaborate?palimpsest - So here's my answer:
I agree with your claim that's why I'm basing all my arguments on it.
How is that difficult to see?palimpsest - Because you ridiculed it from the start, but now you're apparently being earnest, even though it doesn't sound like it. How many times must I repeat myself?Rendle
- Ridicule is nothing to be scared of
Don't you ever, don't you ever
Stop being dandy, showing me you're handsomeGardener - And how many times must I repeat myself? You're the only one that sees a discrepancy in our arguments.palimpsest
- From my point of view you haven't really internalized the significance of vaxxed people no longer being human.palimpsest
- https://www.qbn.com/…palimpsest
- @Rendle a genetically modified tomato is still a tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), it would even fit in the same species but it would be of a different variety.palimpsest
- Take a step back and learn a bit of biology and taxonomy before fronting.palimpsest
- You can't patent an own a tomato created by nature. If you GM it, you can, because it's no longer legally considered a tomato. It's a GM tomato. A different orgRendle
- How many times do I have to say the same thing until you understand?Rendle
- That's the last time I waste time responding to you.Rendle
- A GM tomato is still a tomato. This is not hard to understand. It's not the same variety as a the tomato it's based on but taxonomically it's a tomato.palimpsest
- You can patent a GM tomato. But guess what? It's still a tomato, that's what we're calling it: a patented tomato. Get it?palimpsest
- It's a new variety of..... drumroll.... tomato!palimpsest
- But it's not legally considered a tomato. It's legally considered a GM tomato, which the modifier can own the rights to.Rendle
- If you took the mRNA, you're no longer legally considered a human being, you're a GM human being, which the modifier can own the rights to. It's very simpleRendle
- I honestly don't know why I'm still responding to you, you're an idiot beyond measure.Rendle
- How is a GM tomato not a tomato since tomato is in the name?
What is the name of the species if that makes it clearer?
Serious question.palimpsest - I'm not saying you can't claim ownership of a GM tomato. It's a matter of taxonomy. Where do we place this not tomato?palimpsest
- Thanks for your patience.palimpsest
- It's a different organism. It's been modified. Genetically. To be different. What the fuck are you not understanding?Rendle
- Where do you place it taxonomically? In what genus? It's a simple question.
I understood that it's no longer a tomato.palimpsest - Are we making a new kingdom for genetically modified organisms?palimpsest
- You're just doing any mental gymnastics you possibly can fathom so as not to acknowledge the fact that you're now a genetically modified humanRendle
- Not legally a human being, but a genetically modified human being. You can't patent and own the former, but you can the latter.Rendle
- I have acknowledged I'm no longer human because I'm vaxed.
I want to know why this tomato is no longer a tomato yet you keep calling it a tomato.palimpsest - Idiot.Rendle
- We'll deal with the taxonomy of a modified human later. Let's keep it simple and concentrate on the non-tomato.palimpsest
- Do you understand my question?palimpsest