Coronavirus

Out of context: Reply #6223

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 6,399 Responses
  • Rendle-2

    Pfizer holds the record for the largest criminal fine in history... for illegally promoting toxic drugs, and people like yuekit stuck in psychosis thinks these little small time doctors with nothing to gain, and their reputation to lose, reporting the dangers of the vaccine... are they ones lying, and multi-billion dollar big pharma who hold criminal fines for lying, and tried to suppress the release of the vaccine data in court, are the ones telling the truth.

    It's truly beyond insanity.

    • But they do it for the YouTube views!Gnash
    • You can't even say the word vaccine injury without being censored/shadow bannedRendle
    • Is, lab-leak, still a no-no?Gnash
    • Personally I think that's something they want people to believe because it still justified vaccines and lockdownsRendle
    • JustifiesRendle
    • who is good in this story? its really-really hard to find anything from you what isn't about that the entire world conspired to kill as many as possible :Dsted
    • You're right I'm sorry guys, because they paid a fine one time that means every medication will kill you.yuekit
    • Personally I would never recommend taking any drugs at all, except for the ones sold on Joe Rogan's dropshipping site. You can't trust the establishment,yuekit
    • You only prove yourself to be a fool when your only defense is to ridicule, as others have said.Rendle
    • The point is that the corporation with the biggest criminal fine in history, for lying, is not a trustworthy corporation. Surely you don't fail to understa thatRendle
    • You're taking the word of the biggest liars on earth, over people that haven't been proven to lie. And you don't see the problem even with that alone. InsanityRendle
    • Pfizer have been proven in the court of law to be untrustworthy, to the tune of the biggest fine in history, and you're here defending their word.Rendle
    • You don't see a problem with that, no?Rendle
    • This time they must be being truthful and transparent, right? Even though they already admitted they didn't test for transmission...Rendle
    • ... and they've already tried to hide the results of their other tests for 75 years. And you still trust them? And you don't have an incline of your insanity?Rendle
    • So much so that you're happy to broadcast your allegiance to this proven corrupt corporation online for all to see? Without even questioning yourselfRendle
    • And you think you're the rational, intelligent, critically thinking one here? Genuinely?Rendle
    • It's like allowing a person charged for pedophilia to baby sit your kids and then calling people crazy when they suggest you research them and their history firRendle
    • And then saying 'oh they've been charged once, that must mean that every time they're going to molest my child' as a form of ridiculeRendle
    • And genuinely not realising how utterly moronic you sound.Rendle
    • And suggesting it's foolish to assume that maybe they might just do it again. That's your stance?Rendle
    • lol...I appreciate your dedication to this bit. But think about this, who was it that issued Pfizer with the largest fine in the history of the world?yuekit
    • Was it maybe the US government? But I thought they were supposed to be totally controlled by the drug companies...yuekit
    • Something about this story doesn't add up. But I already told you, I don't take corporate drugs, only anti-establishment drugs.yuekit
    • Every disease can be treated by some combination of Alpha Brain, steroids, magic mushrooms and bulletproof coffee.yuekit
    • The story is 100% true, you can check for yourself. I never said anything about big pharma being controlled by the government...Rendle
    • So now there's an irrefutable piece of evidence against your belief system, you now try to divert to another theory I never even mentioned?Rendle
    • Yes, yes I did. I assumed that was what everyone who thinks the vaccine is killing people believes.yuekit
    • So why do you reckon governments didn't halt the Pfizer vaccine, like they did with the AstraZeneca vaccine when there were reports of potential heart issues?yuekit
    • The whole point was to put people off the AZ vaccine so they would take the mRNA one. The AZ one was the only 'real' vaccineRendle
    • Although they didn't use sars-cov-2 in it, they used an adenovirus getting a monkey. Makes perfect sense right..Rendle
    • From a monkey*Rendle
    • Why would you rather have a virus injected into you vs just RNA? The RNA is actually more of a "light touch" approach, you'd think people skeptical of vaccinesyuekit
    • would prefer this.yuekit
    • I didn't say I'd rather have that injected into me wtf? I don't want EITHER. My point was that why didn't they use sars-cov-2 ina vaccine targeting sars-cov-2?Rendle
    • Why would they use some random adenovirus from a monkey? Instead of covid-19...? Because it's completely made up, that's why. It's just the flu.Rendle
    • If you think being genetically modified, irreversibly, is a light touch, then you really are, truly, truly lost. I knew you were already but... my god.Rendle
    • The Chinese and Indian vaccines are made using SARS-CoV-2 virus. So does that disprove your theory?yuekit

View thread