Russia-Ukraine Invasion

Out of context: Reply #1895

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 2,626 Responses
  • Nairn0

    Is this concerning? This is the recent-most in a line of exceptional advertisements about NATO's second strike capability, with rumblings from the USN for a few months now.

    https://www.thedrive.com/the-war…

    Sabre rattling, or are some in the military genuinely consideriing Some Other might risk a first strike attempt?

    • I think it's *probably* just a friendly reminder to the Ruskies that releasing nukes wouldn't be in their best interest.
      I hope.
      Continuity
    • But then, if the Ruskies need reminding that other countries in the world also have nuclear arsenals, that can't really be a good sign, either.Continuity
    • The best way to spend taxpayer money.OBBTKN
    • These war games are a total idiocy. But as long as you make your people believe that you will be able to win... eh! works!!OBBTKN
    • Honestly, I feel like crying when I hear politicians speak in belligerent terms. Like a certain baroness... Sincerelly, f**k them!OBBTKN
    • Where cost is concerned, there's not a hge difference between having such assets docked and have them fielded.Nairn
    • Military spending grows if there is an enemy, if there isn't, do we invent or create it?OBBTKN
    • The provocation is mutual, the business is mutual... while we fear they make money.OBBTKN
    • Too bad I no longer work for the military sector ;)OBBTKN

View thread