Dall-E, Midjourney, Stable Diffusion (etc) - who's playing, and with which?
Out of context: Reply #6
- Started
- Last post
- 821 Responses
- grafician0
Started MJ, then Dall E and for months now using SD.
SD is the most useful overall. I have access to a no-limit in the cloud image, I can run any prompt I want.
Conceptually SD is the best, Dall E is the most realistic, MJ only for fantasy "featured on artstation" things.
They can all be useful depending on your prompt and needs, more realistic vs. more fantastic. All just for concepting, none of them can output production-ready usefull stuff.
You need hundreds of tries to get something useful 90%. But from there you can continue in Photoshop etc. to re-create something for production.
Copyrights aside, these will replace stock photos and Photoshop in the long run, but no jobs will be displaced as I see it.
All bad with hands ofc, almost all output if cut, no full wide compositions even when you ask for them as all were trained on 512x512 images and that's the limit, even if you ask for wide/portrait composition.
Overall, nice first try, we'll see next year what's up, but unless they re-train every model to bigger images, the size of the model doesn't matter, it will output the same shit - even with 100B images.
Improvement will be to train with all images from Meta (instagram, facebook) then things would be way more realistic. Until then, same limite output.
That's all for now.
- https://imgz.org/iDH…Nairn
- Also Dall E is very censored, while MJ is public and the only choice for private prompts it's SD.grafician
- Technically, features and UX wise too, Dall E is the most advanced.grafician
- Overall you get bored with these pretty quickly, it's just easier to get sketching or building something in Photoshop directly and you don't waste time promptingrafician
- For art directors/designers these are just new tools.
For everybody else, these are just fun for a while, then they skip to the next trendy thinggrafician