America is Fucked

Out of context: Reply #2564

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 3,383 Responses
  • Ramanisky28

    • She’ll find out that the state can have it both ways. If this is true, she should definitely go to court.nb
    • Her argument will backfire if the state decides to allow pregnant women in the HOVnb
    • Pregnant person*palimpsest
    • For her to be correct she would have to cut her baby out or her womb and flop it’s carcass on the seat next to herGnash
    • And she’d get another ticket if it wasn’t in a car seatGnash
    • So it’s not a baby until it’s out of the body? That’s literally having it one way and not the other.monospaced
    • Also I agree. It’s just a fetus before it’s born, and should not be treated like a person with equal rights.monospaced
    • Mono, what they’re saying is that yhe HOV law probably says a person in the passenger seat. Unless a parent with a kid in the back seat counts as HOV?nb
    • Hate to monosplain, mono, but It needs to use a seat. I know it’s a bit complicated but that’s how car-pooling is supposed to work.Gnash
    • lol okay I’m not a fucking idiot, and I didn’t make up your dumbfuck ridiculous hypothetical either so back off lolmonospaced
    • Anyway. If she’s wearing a seatbelt, the child safely inside of her is clearly restrained as well. Lol. Mansplain away, its what you do best.monospaced
    • That was a joke btw. Lighten up.monospaced
    • It was a monosplain, not a man oneGnash
    • Whatever you say. Still not me who came up with the utter fucktard hypothetical, so there’s that.monospaced
    • I think the fact this was actually used as an excuse shows just how ridiculous the whole situation isIanbolton
    • How was mono monsplaining? He asked a question and agreed with youIanbolton
    • I was monosplaingGnash

View thread