religion
religion
Out of context: Reply #2586
- Started
- Last post
- 3,481 Responses
- shapesalad-1
Until Christ, many of the religions at the time involved sacrifice, which obviously was traumatic. Christ sacrificed himself for his followers, thusly becoming a much more palatable form of religion.
- I learnt that from a Jordan P podcast.shapesalad
- Except he didn’t sacrifice himself for anyone. He was crucified like many others.monospaced
- You get the gist.shapesalad
- It’s not that palatable.
It’s a cannibalistic cult obsessed with death and shame and its most devout followers are absolute shitheadsscarabin - The definition of "sacrifice" changed.
All those scriptures could led to misinterpretation if you do not have the key to understand them.ApeRobot - lol, as if there was a correct interpretation of the outdated fiction that is "scripture," that in no way leads to any form of understanding of ... anything.monospaced
- But yeah, I guess if we're talking about duping gullible, scared morons into a belief system, the absolutely lazy approach of the jesus sacrifice is a good one.monospaced
- and the 1AD international marketing award goes to peter, john and paulkingsteven
- I don't think so unless it was animal sacrifice, which Christians still practice._niko
- can we go back a minute to when scarabin said that christians are CANNIBALS********
- yes, yes, they drink his blood and eat his flesh while kneeling in front of an image of him dead and nailed to a fucking crossmonospaced