Coronavirus
Coronavirus
Out of context: Reply #5136
- Started
- Last post
- 6,399 Responses
- Ramanisky21
- Regerts!utopian
- that's the problem, it's not that they're afraid, it's that they think it's a hoax, some plot from a nefarious group and that they're too smart to fall for it_niko
- Yasss! Jesus saves the day! Miracle.PhanLo
- for every Joe AntiVaxer who is dying now there is Joe ProVaxer who had vaccine and is in the morgue now. But news doesn't talk about them.pr2
- yeaaa faith! cuz that works : |futurefood
- "They're all crisis actors...It's all an orchestrated elaborate hoax conducted by the radical left wing agenda" - Alex Jonesutopian
- Pr2 is baaaacccccckkk!PhanLo
- Where's your data pr2? Source that shit.FNP14
- 2021+ years ago you might have sacrificed a goat or something, maybe a small child, but because Jesus was sacrificed for us, we just pray.shapesalad
- That's how Jesus has saved lives. But overall she's an idiot....shapesalad
- Pr2: it only has a 1% mortality rate, its just the flu!
Also Pr2: the vaccine has a 1% mortality rate and the morgues are full!robotinc - How many died from vaccine and how many died from vivid? WHERE IS THE DATA?pango
- Also yes people died from blooded clog caused by vax. And it was on the news. People also get blood clog from covid.pango
- And hi. Welcome back!pango
- *covid.
lolpango - I feel sorry for the people who "do their own research" and become expert epidemiologists. Oh wait, no I don't.inteliboy
- That’s not true pr2. There are millions of deaths from covid. There is a very low number of deaths from the vaccine or people vaccinated.monospaced
- I think there were like 5 blood clot deaths worldwide? Breakthrough deaths are nearly nonexistent, if at all.monospaced
- The chance of complications is lower than from vax. And also it's nothing you wouldn't have gotten from covid anyway if you don't die.pango
- Jesus tried to kill you and your family. Think about that morons.monospaced
- Wait I meant chance of complication from vax is lower than from covid.pango
- If course it is. My many magnitudes it is lower. So much lower it’s almost non existent in comparison.monospaced
- CDC data: 5k deaths from vaccines last year alone (almost all from covid vaccine).
currently 5% of covid deaths in US is due to vaccine.pr2 - some of you have to spend less time on QBN and read science papers out there.pr2
- of course a simpleton in the room will take the CDC's 5k vaccine deaths and try to compare it to 630k of covid deaths with zero understanding that a valid...pr2
- ...comparison would be against covid deaths SINCE vaccine roll out. then it would be 5k against ~100k.pr2
- but basic logic was thrown out the window long ago, so why am i stills trying???pr2
- i don't see news crews interviewing all those mothers, fathers, husbands, wifes, sisters, brothers etc of the 5k who took the vaccine and are in the graves now.pr2
- "Reports of adverse events ... following vaccination, including deaths, do not necessarily mean that a vaccine caused a health problem.dorf
- A review of available clinical information, including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records, has not established a causal link to COVID-19 vaccines."dorf
- 4,000 deaths is not 5% of covid deaths. Your math is as stupid as your bullshit data.monospaced
- It’s not news because you’re being lied to. It’s not real.monospaced
- https://www.cdc.gov/…dorf
- 6500 covid vaccine deaths in 6 months alone. (in US only)pr2
- https://www.research…pr2
- "only 14% of the cases for which a vaccine reaction could be ruled out as a contributing factor in their death"pr2
- Hey pr2...fuck off cunt.
Can we ban this fucker?BusterBoy - pr2 being a dingus. forgets to add:
For 203 of the 250 (81%) the vaccine may have been a factor in their death; however, many of these patients had one or moredorf - chronic or age-related comorbid conditions. Finally, for at least 13 of the 250 deaths (5%) the vaccine was the most likely cause of death;dorf
- let's give him the benefit of doubt. forget what dorf just said. corona death was averaging 1k a day vs vax death 6.5k in 6 months.pango
- ... (in US only). which is worst?pango
- Mindy Mindy Mindy...milfhunter
- Study group was “made up primarily of those who are elderly or with significant health conditions.”monospaced
- Also says that 1/3 of results are probably bullshit and this is just reports not science.monospaced
- It is also lumping in the last 4 years of flu vaccines it appears. This is t a study on covid vaccines but really vaccines in general among the most susceptiblemonospaced
- pr2, you cuntbabydick
- pr2: "6500 is 5% of 617k, read the science" - fails to read the abstract hahahkingsteven
- There are dozens and dozens of articles explaining how that VAERS data is not accurate and is being used my fucktards to spread misinformation.monospaced
- Congrats, pr2, you're one of those moronic sheep who lives in fear and denies reality. I hope you don't beg for the vaccine when your time comes.monospaced
- holy shit, guys i though it's only mono who has 2 brain cells working hard to keep him alive.pr2
- i'm not even responding to the mono moron anymore, but i guess i have to put some other "stable geniuses" on the list too.pr2
- in almost ALL covid/vaccine death cases comorbidity was a factor. fuck me guy, how dumb can you be not to understand it?pr2
- 70% of the reports came from health care pros, not some jaded anti-vaxers. Guys, lift the self-inflicted blinders on the facts.pr2
- in 5% of the cases, vaccines were DIRECTLY responsible. Shit, how much of an idiot you have to be what the implications of this statement are in context...pr2
- ...of hundreds of millions vaccines distributed.pr2
- 1k a day vs vax death 6.5k in 6 months in US only. Which is worse?pango
- I'm sure your 6 yrs old can math that one out.pango
- what you said is "5% of covid deaths in US is due to vaccine." - it's 5% of the 6500 deaths (where the vaccine was thought to be a contributing factor) that thekingsteven
- vaccine was the direct cause of death.kingsteven
- btw. i have a sub to researchgate, so if you want to misread the entire paper, rather than just the abstract... let me knowkingsteven
- i missed the post where you said since vax roll out, but it is still a daft assumption given the seroprevalence indicated that 18% had covid before the roll outkingsteven
- half the country vaccinated since (mostly over 65) and most of the deaths from the vaccine had other contributing factorskingsteven
- here's the full VAERS interim results paper https://www.dropbox.…kingsteven
- 5% (320) were direct deaths of vaccine, 67% (4300) were due to comorbidity with vaccine. There are dozens of "was anti-vaccine and now is dying,"pr2
- examples in this threat. With 4300 people who were pro-vaccine but now are dead you would find more articles or video clips about those people.pr2
- And yet you don't. The fact that no one on this forum questions what that is, is simply shameful.pr2
- Seriously, i get that most fucks here don't know how to read the most basic science paper, but the fact that they don't engage the debate how media...pr2
- ...grossly favor one debate over another is just mind boggling on a forum that is filled with media makers.pr2
- I get that, it is very odd to read papers ie VAERS where they make direct comparisons to flu vaccine deaths, while 'it's not a flu' can shut down any comparisonkingsteven
- in the public sphere. another example would be stating the YLL of 10.5 years to dismiss the idea that the majority of covid deaths were notkingsteven
- premature mortality, when this is widely accepted in many models as a big contributing factor to pandemic waves. and using a simple calculationkingsteven
- based on a standard life expectancy that has +/- 10 years between the rich and poor and at the same time acknowledging the wealth gap, acknowledgingkingsteven
- the virus spreads to the elderly and infirm via healthcare workers, facilities and through undervalued front line workers etc. there is no meta-analysiskingsteven
- its quite deliberately a trope to shut down discussion until that analysis is complete, but people do come to believe it unquestionablykingsteven
- but using a time period to compare covid and vaccine deaths follows a similar theme of oversimplification, i can take any other metrickingsteven
- (even double the serology case estimations) and knock that 5% down to <0.36%. and if you do any analysis of age you'll actually have to bring in some sort ofkingsteven
- YLL or 'it's not a flu vaccine' argument of your own to maintain any statistical significance. i have unpopular posts on here from early in the vaccine roll-outkingsteven
- where i was waiting to be convinced they are safe, from everything i've read - if you are healthy it is an absolute no-brainer to get the vaccinekingsteven
- because not even factoring in any positive effects of the vaccine above. just deaths like an antivaxxer. but from all reports they are understated tookingsteven