UFO of the day

Out of context: Reply #700

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 1,136 Responses
  • yuekit2

    Anything is possible but I think simplest explanation is that this is a propaganda campaign of some kind by the US military. This article talks about how the USA has a long history of using "UFOs" as cover for secret military programs starting with the Roswell crash.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/…

    What kind of sense does it make after all...if the government really thought we were being invaded by alien spacecraft or by super advanced Chinese military jets...to publicly brainstorm about all this stuff for months and admit they have no idea what it is?

    But it does make sense if they are trying to provide cover for testing out secret new technology themselves. Or sending a message to other countries that we have some unknown capability they should be afraid of.

    The technology wouldn't necessarily have to be as impossible as it appears. There could be an element of illusion in the footage that's been released, which is all from the government itself after all.

    • this is the most likely yep and I say this after decades of following the subject. But decades of eye witnesses beg to differ, what's in it for them? Many lostfadein11
    • their jobs in the police, military, airlines etc. for reporting it. The idea they all wanted attention/money or were insane doesn't really stand up either.fadein11
    • if it is a disinfo campaign it's just so bad though.fadein11
    • saying that, no worse than the Roswell debacle.fadein11
    • if it's disinfo it's so perfect it's got professional designers claiming world dominating tech is being hidden from usmonospaced
    • perfect mulching over of the leaked videos, admission of nothing, and it's got everyone in a tizzy over blurry pixels and a 60 minutes spot on primetimemonospaced
    • so perfect, the fans just do the rest :)monospaced
    • ha, so good most here (including yourself) said it was all debunked by a guy on youtube.fadein11
    • haven't read that NYT article as paywall but are they backtracking after originally breaking the story? that would be interesting if so.fadein11
    • I didn’t say it was all debunked.monospaced
    • They didn’t really break any story, and even if this was that, it doesn’t need backtracking. Cutemonospaced
    • the NYT 100% broke the story, whether you deem it important or not.fadein11
    • I'm not arguing from any angle here, whatever the reasons for the Pentagon etc. to suddenly say after decades the phenonemon is real and unexplained isfadein11
    • very interesting. Disinfo, black projects, or ET (!) whatever it's pretty fascinating.fadein11
    • Feels more like the pentagon is admitting the footage is real (theirs), but not much more. A whole bunch of “may” and so on.monospaced
    • real and unidentified yep, one would hope the most tech advanced superpower on Earth would have some more answers.fadein11
    • I don't think they need to retract anything since the 2019 story just talked about what pilots claimed to see. And here they are pointing out that in theyuekit
    • past, government sometimes misled the public about UFOs. None of that proves anything, unknown explanation is still possible but so is government trickery.yuekit
    • It does feel like the black ops angle has not been fully explored by most of the media coverage. Government saying there's no evidence that what you are seeingyuekit
    • is part of a top secret classified program seems like a strange thing to take at face value. It could also be one part of the government not communicating withyuekit
    • the rest. One thing we do know is that USA, Russia and China are working on these next generation technologies such as hypersonic aircraft and weapons system.yuekit
    • yupmonospaced

View thread