Coronavirus

Out of context: Reply #4820

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 6,418 Responses
  • Ramanisky24

    • if true, I guess it's to prevent wide spread panic, but then it also fuels the pr2 "it's just a flu" crowd_niko
    • The Wuhan Flu ain't no joke.utopian
    • If this is true I'd say it's mostly just a failure of health systems to accurately record all the deaths.reanimate
    • some say its a democratic hoax...only the smartest people though.neverscared
    • Where is China on this list?TOMMYxGUNN
    • ^I was about to ask that, it's amazing how easily we excuse china from any covid discussion lately
      ********
    • ^"we" as in everybody, not only on QBN
      ********
    • Because we know what ever data China gives out is full of shit, so why include it ?Gnash
    • niko, if you were not a dum-dum, you would look up at flu mortality before making stupid comments like that.pr2
    • of course nuance of data is perpetually lost on cavemen like yourself.pr2
    • Yeah ok 60k on a bad year with no masks and no measures vs 2 million covid deaths with semi- draconian measures. yup flu is worse. grunt_niko
    • cavemen haha. what a clown.monospaced
    • son, let me guess, you never bothered reading the paper the graph came from. you never bothered looking at their methodology. am i right?pr2
    • cretins like you don't even understand the basics of punctuation and the purpose behind quotation marks in a statement, much less science.pr2
    • the reason why guys like you perpetually sit in shit in their pants is because you don't understand the relativity of danger.pr2
    • flu with it's 60k death would easily turn into 500k+ if it was x3 of covid in death and 3x covid's transmissibility.pr2
    • wrongmonospaced
    • correctpr2
    • nopemonospaced

View thread