Coronavirus
Coronavirus
Out of context: Reply #4665
- Started
- Last post
- 6,418 Responses
- renderedred-6
"emergency use authorization"
- I bet you feel so smart.monospaced
- Well this wouldn't exist without the fuckin covid-19 so ofc it's Emergency use only as we're in an emergency situation********
- anyway, too bad it doesn't mention anything about the 5G capabilities, kinda disappointing********
- @graf there's an ever so slight difference between "emergency use" and "approved". yeah 5g :)renderedred
- it's this one sided good v bad thinking that's stopping any dialog. how about we expand the thinking into:pr2
- "though possibly dangerous, the benefits might outweigh the risks" (especially in older population)pr2
- what dangers? what risks?monospaced
- just having a dialogmonospaced
- EVERY medicine goes thru long-term risk testing. this one didn't.pr2
- as was joked somewhere else, bleach kills viruses too and yet we dob't need testing to know that it's probably best not to consume it.pr2
- this is common sense.
your common sense tells you that something that was never used before is safe. MY common sense tells me otherwise.pr2 - ^thisrenderedred
- @pr2 that's what i've been saying all along, people just refuse to think about in those terms.renderedred
- i never said a vaccine will kill you or don't wear a mask, i wear one outside all the time from the get-go. i don't think corona is a hoax...renderedred
- So not a single thing you can say might be the risk? You asked for dialog but refuse to even say. Weird.monospaced
- same as you can't be 100% that it is 100% safe.renderedred
- and again, after 10 years of testing under strict conditions still there are side effects, sure, 1 in a million gets such and such reaction.renderedred
- but then you KNOW that as a risk. at the moment you know 0.renderedred
- and in ten years when pfizer gets approval for good, they'll tell you what they found out and what are the dangers,renderedred
- after testing it on YOU my man.renderedred
- I didn't say it's 100% safe, did I? I said there's no reason not to think it is, except if you have an active imagination and irrational fear.monospaced
- You KEEP talking about 10 years and side effects. What side effect? What reaction or dangers worry you? And why? If you can't be specific, you aren't rationalmonospaced
- Right now we know that no known vaccine has long term effects. We have no reason to believe this one will. We have no experts that are worried.monospaced
- I'm not saying it's guaranteed safe, I'm saying that there's simply no reason to believe it isn't. No mechanism is even hypothesized that might cause issue.monospaced
- pro-vaxers might want to read up on ups and downs of mRNA development. it reads like a really good suspense novel.pr2
- to say there is no POSSIBLE serous long-term risks is just naive.pr2