Coronavirus
Coronavirus
Out of context: Reply #4663
- Started
- Last post
- 6,399 Responses
- pr2-15
Pfizer data reveals 98.4% efficacy if you do NOT vaccinate your children with their vaccine.
- you know what, make a doc about it, that pushes the format of film.tank02
- do you prefer the Pfizer's spin on the data?pr2
- that isn’t actually one of the conclusions. you probably decided to do your shitbag math and divided the 18 cases by the placebo group number like a moronmonospaced
- that isn’t what efficacy is and certainly isn’t how it works in coming to meaningful conclusions. Clown ass math again.monospaced
- please share your conclusions so we can collectively laugh at your "wisdom."pr2
- This is showing how effect the vaccine is, regardless of if you showed symptoms before or not.robotinc
- It is not recommending to not vaccinate kids.robotinc
- Unless I am blind (which is possible, please point to where they mention that no vaccine is 98.4% as effective as doing nothing)robotinc
- the point is that its Pfizer's PR stunt: take the vaccinate = your kid is 100% safe. Great! Lets use the exact same data and point to another equally...pr2
- ...true statement: don't take the vaccine = your kid is 98.4% safe.pr2
- and no, do not vaccinate your kids with this! this vaccine is not FDA approved and only got emergency approval which requires WAY less stringent tests.pr2
- REGULAR vaccines are FDA approved. This one is not.pr2
- Where did you get 98.4% safe without a vaccine? And what does safe mean anyway? THEY didn’t say that word. It’s not what this is about.monospaced
- Thanks dr2GuyFawkes
- Efficacy is about containing the virus and the spread. Children are definitely contracting and spreading it, but have ALWAYS generally been safe themselves.monospaced
- Your logic is that they are already low risk so no need for vaccine?! That ignores their ability to be a transmission vector. Dude. Wake up.monospaced
- come on man, our constant fights aside. do your own math. of course THEY don't say that not vaccinating is almost as safe as vaccinating. but are u surprised?pr2
- Where did you get your fake ass percentage? Not from this study. You pulled it out of your anti mask fucktard ass. That’s where.monospaced
- You’re batshit crazy if you think your cook ass is “educating” anyone. You’re a joke, just like anyone who still thinks this is not a serious pandemic. A joke.monospaced
- Enjoy the well deserved ridicule you will continue to receive from rational people here. Joke.monospaced
- my man, you don't even understand definitions of something that can be googled in 5 seconds. shame on you bro.pr2
- the number of papers that spells out how kids experience it WAY milder than adults, and generally are WAY lesser spreaders than adults is astronomical.pr2
- it takes considerable effort NOT to read those papers.pr2
- it's like you have a bucket filled with hardened concrete that you choose to wear each time information that goes against your believes enter your vision.pr2
- we are learning how this mRNA vaccine works on LIVE population and that is wrong, i'll say it again. want to be a part of an experiment go for it!renderedred
- there is a good reason it takes 5-10 years to approve a vaccine for general use.renderedred
- pfizer is the FIRST EVER mRNA vaccine to be approved after how long in development? 3? 6 months?renderedred
- and now mono is going to say: 20 years of research in monkeys and rats :)renderedred
- You have no reason to believe there’s an issue with the vaccine. No other vaccine has long term health effects. Why would you think this one does?monospaced
- And yes. There had been decades of research into mRNA functions, for vaccines and other treatments. To act like it’s only months old is stupid af.monospaced
- Once again you clowns, enjoy being conspiratorial morons, and enjoy the well deserved ridicule from those of us who actually understand and care.monospaced
- 20 years or research and only one vaccine developed using this technology? Those fat cats at Pfizer and Moderna really don't want to get rich.pr2
- @mono every other vaccine with low probability of long term effects has been tested on humans for years. i repeat for years!renderedred
- in a controlled environment and under no political/business pressure.renderedred
- and now, suddenly it takes 6 months? so one of the two is wrong. testing it for 10 years clinically or straight into the population. which one?renderedred
- *i guess with this new mRNA messenger technology, it's obsolete to test clinically. we have the population for that ;)renderedred
- by that logic you *could* inject bleach, why not?renderedred
- **it's a known and well researched FACT that bleach kills viruses :)renderedred
- Moronic arguments. Wow.monospaced
- The o lu reason these didn’t happen earlier was there was no reason. Fucking morons the both of you.monospaced
- And your bleach comment is so stupid, you almost sound as brain dead as pr2 here. I’m guessing you’re also a videographer by day and science denier by night.monospaced
- Also, way to ignore reality. The hunt for the vaccine started a solid 15 months ago. mRNA has been studied for 30 years. It wasn’t invented 6 months ago.monospaced
- Every single one of your retorts relies entirely on your fabricated fake as fuck version of reality, with a huge dose of willing ignorance. Assholesmonospaced
- chill out pharma bro, your stonks are doing finerenderedred