NFTs
NFTs
Out of context: Reply #21
- Started
- Last post
- 844 Responses
- scarabin1
Apart from the video game and music stuff being cross-platform (which would be dope), it appears to be basically animated gifs ‘n’ screensaver shit. Why would i want to “own” an animated gif?
I just don’t see the appeal, it’s like someone saying suddenly all the bits of scrap paper on the ground are collectible, but only to people who nerd out on blockchains. My reply to that is basically good for them, but from the outside it seems ludicrous.
Clearly, i’m missing something? And i love this techy shit
- I think you're right. People seem enamored with the purchasing technique but the underlying asset has basically no value. I don't think Peeble would have hadzarkonite
- difficulty selling out his artwork no matter the venue, but somehow folks are acting like it's the NFT that made it possible.zarkonite
- read in an article on cointelegraph a few days ago Beeple gives no fucks about NFTs, he just wanna get paid (Christies auction)grafician
- Beeple: "Nobody's going to give any shit about how NFT's work or what blockchain they're on."grafician
- Selling canvases makes sense but owning digital art seems utterly pointlessscarabin
- I think i just need to read more about itscarabin
- ‚early 21st century art‘. just imagine 2029 when MoMa calls to secure the exhibition rights for a gif you bought with some hash online.uan