Coronavirus

Out of context: Reply #3516

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 6,399 Responses
  • deathboy2

    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vs…

    Good news everyone!

    So cdc does have so.e number based on a algo that sure can be checked and no real hard data for a couple of years. But it looks Like their number only show an excess death of around 69k. Annually deaths are around 1.5 million under same curriculum. So percentage is less than a percentage but we have pushed gov emergency powers and control, Printed insane amounts of capital while Increasing unemployment worse than great depression... Does it seem rational? Hurt more than you save (21k excess was alz dementia) hurts big med... Even if we were to see 150k die. We'd see a correction in following years fixing base average. Such political garbage in my opinion.

    deathboy 2Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • https://i.imgur.com/…utopian
    • "printed insane amounts of capital" umm yeah that never happenedjonny_quest_lives
    • "even if we were to see 150k die"
      quick google check Current US Death toll: 164,000      jonny_quest_lives
    • Hmm how much debt did we monetize? And those are excessive deaths outside normal averages. They don't even take into consideration the monetization of covid repdeathboy
    • But 8 mo in. .04% outside avg and a 1/3 are the walking dead. And still this is without mass testing wherecdc reported last month estimates over 30mildeathboy
    • When this is done and real numbers come out I expect lockdowns caused more casualties and paindeathboy
    • If we see 150k excessive it's less than a 1%. But unemployment between 25-30%.just mull it over. Is this smart? Or are we being played by political interestsdeathboy
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread