Coronavirus

Out of context: Reply #3138

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 6,418 Responses
  • whatthefunk11

    A vintage clothing store isn't arguing with customers about wearing masks

    https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/03/u…

    • I have zero issue wearing my mask... but this sort of hypocritical smugness would instantly make me turn around and head to another store.PonyBoy
    • These fuckers DEPEND on 'dead grandmothers' (and the like) to keep their store filled... yet attempt to apply that guilt to you over a mask. Lol... c'mon.PonyBoy
    • maybe they have had too many "debates" at the door with people refusing to wear mask.pango
    • still doesn't require a smug statement... 'masks are required — this is not up for debate — thank you'
      done.
      PonyBoy
    • i'm actually fine with people being smug at people who put others at risk. reckless behavior will be shunned. isn't that just how the world works?pango
    • good business deems you not be a douche on other side of the transaction. if they truly cared they'd temporarily close their doors and not put anyone at risk...PonyBoy
    • ...instead they're kind enough to let us know up front they're just dicks trying to make a buck regardless of yours or my health—just capitalist assholes, yes?PonyBoy
    • yes. store risking people's life by opening up and customer risking people's life by going out. Everyone's dick. bunch of dickspango
    • https://i.makeagif.c…PonyBoy
    • https://img.buzzfeed…pango
    • Omg dude saying that they "rely on dead grsndmothers" wtf
      ********
    • The argument that they will have fewer items to sell if they enforce masks is something deathboy might say.monospaced
    • They said it, nb... only they shifted their already existing ‘need for dead grandmothers’ on you, the non-mask wearer instead of their existing business planPonyBoy
    • and if you can't tell I'm just trolling the troll here... the sign is as dumb as my comments (meaning: they're both unnecessary)PonyBoy

View thread