Coronavirus

Out of context: Reply #3131

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 6,418 Responses
  • Morning_star-1

    The Origin of Covid 19 is unlikely to be natural.

    Medium Article:
    https://medium.com/@yurideigin/l…

    In depth technical discussion of Covid 19 origins with Bret Weinstein & Yuri Deigin:

    Morning_star -1Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • Those who say it's natural, have the burden of proof. Prove it.shapesalad
    • < That podcast goes into some very technical scientific reasons as to why it isn't natural. It's very convincing.Morning_star
    • Natural origins rarely require burden of proof. Has there ever been a manufactured corona virus or other living virus before?monospaced
    • Yes and no. The virus is natural but a lab can edit it and add markers for commercial and study reasons. The Covid-19 viruas has these markers.Morning_star
    • Anything is possible but we should have some humility. As non-experts it's very difficult for us to assess this vs. the majority of scientists who say otherwiseyuekit
    • Even this Yuri Deigin guy is apparently not a virologist, he's a "biotech entrepreneur and longevity research evangelist"yuekit
    • 'Those who say it's natural, have the burden of proof. Prove it.' haha, seriously? Fuck, someone should go back and look into syphilis et al too, right?Nairn
    • In fact - someone best PROVE to me that cats aren't man-made, and I ain't taking no hieroglyphs as evidence - so easy to fake. EVERYTHING. FIRST. PRINCIPLE.Nairn
    • @yuekit. His bio is here. He is very much an expert. https://ca.linkedin.…Morning_star
    • ...and Bret Weinstein is an Evolutionary Biologist, i'm pretty certain that they have enough smarts between them to come to a credible conclusion.Morning_star
    • bio *cough* weaponKrassy
    • brett said also in another podcast, that if light can‘t penetrate his black bandana ‚mask‘, also a virus couldn‘t.uan
    • I think he is wrong. but he has some title that would suggest he is right. but I don‘t think that‘s how light worksuan
    • My understanding is that during that particular episode I think he was saying that 1. Mounts coverings are good and 2. If light couldn’t penetrate the face...Morning_star
    • ...covering then it’s unlikely water droplets carrying COVID would either. Either way, something is better than nothing.

      Mounts = Mouth      Morning_star
    • not opposing the idea of some protection better than nothing. But comparing sizes of photons to sizes of virus' didn't sound right. his brother could explain ituan
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread