#BLM

Out of context: Reply #262

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 604 Responses
  • omahadesigns-2

    • YupGnash
    • This hypothetical cartoon person is a great point.nb
    • wut? ok. dont know who you're talking about. if you talking about the police, he's in trouble because he murdered george floyd.pango
    • Not police, pango - just the likes of whatever greater uninvolved and/or known person, saying something stupid and double standards forcing accountNairn
    • Lol at haircannonball1978
    • Doxxed and firing =/= getting killed, but I see your point.cannonball1978
    • The police didn't mention in the police report that they were killing him because he held a gun to a pregnant woman's stomach in the past. Weird.monospaced
    • But, we all know that the punishment for being abusive is the death penalty, and you can be executed by the police in the street at any time. Fact.monospaced
    • Oh wait, none of this is true, but is required if you want to justify homicidal racism in the police force. There's no point unless you change reality, as shwnmonospaced
    • @mono, you missed the point completely.Morning_star
    • I guess so. Guess I’m an idiot.monospaced
    • Yes. LOL.deadsperm
    • LolGnash
    • [They] summarize the soft left.
      Not smart enough to get the nuances but smart enough to get offended.
      deadsperm
    • that -soft left - generalisation is one dumby dumby thing to write.neverscared
    • They Don't Think It Be Like It Is, But It Dodeadsperm
    • ^ wut? lol
      i've only heard 13-22 yrs old talking like that.
      pango
    • https://en.wikipedia…deadsperm
    • i guess kids are bring it back.pango
    • Deuteronomy 32:7deadsperm
    • Same crew that defends the burqas but somehow glosses over the honour killings and the gay assassinations._niko
    • ^ I doubt that is correctpango

View thread