white supremacy

Out of context: Reply #98

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 155 Responses
  • Gnash-1

    • https://upload.wikim…Gnash
    • ???pango
    • ???utopian
    • Why confused? She lays out a good case hereGnash
    • She repeated it, and everythingGnash
    • If true. That is amazing.pango
    • They also didn’t have slaveryGnash
    • Wow much nicepango
    • is that because those native nations women had no western styled rights? Just walking fun holes for any males??? weird thing to suggest. ive seen duck rape.deathboy
    • I'm not sure. Plz find out for me.pango
    • Well, I’m sure she has 100% proof of this and it‘s on twitter then it must be true.NBQ00
    • i can't tell anymore. are they saying it as a fact? or a sarcastic joke? and the moment you comment on it, they go "it's a joke!. lighten up!"pango
    • She is serious. She’s a human rights lawyerGnash
    • She believes that colonialism brought at evils. Before that, life for First Nations was just a magical frolic through leafy glades.Gnash
    • i dont know man. all the asterisk over emphasizing. could be sarcasm, could be a bad joke. so hard to tell now a day. people use jokes to hide from criticism.pango
    • really annoying.
      i mean. are they trolling or are they stupid?!?! ugggghhhh
      pango
    • well pango look towards your ability to discern bullshit. hemingway nailed it as the most important tool for a humandeathboy
    • and look where he ended up.pango
    • lolmonospaced
    • < she is serious. Not trollingGnash
    • This is just not true.cannonball1978

View thread