Coronavirus

Out of context: Reply #2826

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 6,418 Responses
  • shapesalad-5

    This will be instantly downvoted..I know... but, open minds guys, try to see it from all sides:

    RaTG13 – the undeniable evidence that the Wuhan coronavirus is man-made:

    https://nerdhaspower.weebly.com/…

    Here's what I'm not able to compute in order to believe it really came from nature - it wasn't bat season they hibernate over winter, there aren't any bats in the area, and for the virus to leap from bat > pangolin > human, well pangolins don't have the type of cells that covid-19 attaches itself to, so... how does it work? and why didn't the Chinese cull all bats and pangolins within a 100km radius to prevent more infections? If you wanted to stop more outbreaks surely you'd cull all animals that transmit the virus to humans?

    shapesalad -5Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE, hosted on a weebly.com free tier account.
      ********
    • haha -3 in the space of 2mins, some fast readers here...shapesalad
    • This is a bit like climate change skepticism...anythin... is possible but why rely on fringe people and non-experts on such a complex topic?yuekit
    • If the evidence is so undeniable, why are actual virologists saying the opposite? Why rely on some anonymous guy's blog?yuekit
    • Just the fact that you call it ‘Wuhan coronavirus’ is evidence enough that you are trying very hard to confirm your bias instead of having intellectual honesty.sr_rosa
    • shapesalad instead of complaining about being downvoted (I didn't downvote) stick around defend some of these points if you can...yuekit
    • For instance, one of the leading theories is that it was circulating in humans for a long time before evolving to become so infectious.yuekit
    • I don't see how that is inconsistent with anything you mentioned...but then again I'm not a virologist lol. There are all kinds of things are could be missing.yuekit
    • "why didn't the Chinese cull all bats?"
      UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE
      ********
    • "why are actual virologists saying the opposite?" Well, check who they are, some have been involved trying to make more dangerous viruses and depend on funding.shapesalad
    • "It wasn't even bat season!!!"
      UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE.
      ********
    • " Why rely on some anonymous guy's blog?" Why also rely on mainstream media? Why not not rely, & simply listen to both sides and go with the most plausible.shapesalad
    • I'm not saying it isn't from Nature, I'm asking, how was it possible. Perhaps evidence of frozen bats, stored from 6 months and sold at the market, theshapesalad
    • Yes but tens of thousands of scientists, governments etc around the world have been studying the virus for months.yuekit
    • virus surviving in their frozen flesh, would be good evidence. But that's not been presented. So I ask how. I don't say my questions are evidence, but I ask.shapesalad
    • And if you have factual and plausible answers I'm all ears.shapesalad
    • If it was so obvious that it was man made, would someone else (aside from anon guy with Weebly blog) have not pointed this out by now?yuekit
    • ...bat ears infact.shapesalad
    • Dunning-Kruger effect in all its glory. When you are so ignorant on a given topic you do not even know how unqualified you are to evaluate different hypothesis.sr_rosa
    • The virus was created in the same lab that created 9/11
      ********
    • In terms of how's it's possible, what about the scenario I mentioned above? Why couldn't it have already been circulating in humans and someone brought it toyuekit
    • the market? Or another animal was carrying the virus and sold at the market?yuekit
    • One thing that most scientists seem to agree on is that there was an intermediary host between bats and humans.yuekit
    • Anyway I agree we should keep open mind, but when someone puts up an anonymous blog like this, unprofessionally written etc it seems like there is a motive.yuekit
    • yuekit, regarding in being in humans long before evolving to become so infectious/dangerous... read the article <shapesalad
    • If someone did have clear evidence it was man made you would think the exact opposite would be true, they would want their name out there as the personyuekit
    • who discovered this. You would also expect the US government and other rivals of China to call this out.yuekit
    • And where is Batman in all this?!!!
      UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE.      microkorg
    • Saying that someone have to read every article published anonymously to make your mind, is like saying you have to watch child porn to know if you are into it.sr_rosa
    • I didn't say to read every article, just this one..shapesalad
    • Sure you did, you pervert.sr_rosa
    • One thing we can say for sure, in the past viruses DID jump from animals to humans naturally and the exact origin was never discovered. So it would hardly beyuekit
    • impossible or unprecedented for this to have happened.yuekit
    • 100 years later, they are still debating where the "Spanish flu" came from. They aren't even sure which continent it originated on.yuekit
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread