Coronavirus

Out of context: Reply #2658

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 6,418 Responses
  • shapesalad-3

    • Two downvotes instantly... is that coded in when I post this guys videos? Anyway... what with no bias and make your own conclusions.shapesalad
    • *watchshapesalad
    • are you going to start calling it the USAvirus yet?kingsteven
    • the paragraph he cuts apart at 16 min says "most likely the result of natural selection" but there's a larger section in that same article that points to labkingsteven
    • release as a possibility. at 37 min he says they should soften the report "you know what? we cant be sure" he's misrepresenting that article which goes in tokingsteven
    • far more detail about how unlikely the receptor binding method was one that had been studied and even says "there are documented instances of laboratory escapeskingsteven
    • of SARS-CoV", don't usually mind this guys videos and he makes some good points but what point is he trying to make?kingsteven
    • that it was *deliberately manipulated* by an *american funded* programme *in wuhan* AND there was a *cover up* when it *accidentally* released?kingsteven
    • not one bit of evidence connecting the method of manipulation, funding connection to wuhan, his proof of a cover up "you keep seeing the same names"kingsteven
    • (the names of some of the biggest name virologists) and misrepresents an article that says it's unlikely to have been manipulated as his core argument.kingsteven
    • btw it was shit but i've upvoted... but you can understand why people downvote 39 minute youtube videos with sensationalist headlines and no description? right?kingsteven

View thread