Coronavirus
Coronavirus
Out of context: Reply #2446
- Started
- Last post
- 6,418 Responses
- robotron3k-9
Stanford test results on Coronavirus, this will not make Bill Gates and Dr. Fauci very happy...
- Chill, this is nothing new. The rate is obv under 1% if you test A LOT of the population...but nobody is doing it to keep the numbers low/high********
- but also https://statmodeling…********
- and another study and discussion: https://news.ycombin…********
- Peer review rejects this study https://medium.com/@…Krassy
- this is ripped apart by common sense analysis here:shapesalad
- https://youtu.be/R8P…shapesalad
- ^ it's really no different to the estimates we made at the start based on small samples. there are > 10 other serology tests with similar figures...kingsteven
- in a couple of weeks we will know, but i agree stanford does seem to be within the specificity of the test kits... some of the other studies are lab testskingsteven
- pff, I never trust guys in ill fitting suits, I never trust guys with moustaches, and I never trust Greeks! lol_niko
- figures, Covididiot would post this.utopian
- also he says" it's no worse than the seasonal flu" except than in europe, the flu kills 75k per year, this has killed 95k in two months with draconian measures_niko
- or if we take a look at sweden who has taken the least drastic measures, we'll see that in 2018-19 there were 505 deaths due to influenza and 1760 so far due to_niko
- covid https://www.folkhals…_niko
- It's weird as fuck this video.kingsteven
- Chill, this is nothing new. The rate is obv under 1% if you test A LOT of the population...but nobody is doing it to keep the numbers low/high