Coronavirus

Out of context: Reply #2118

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 6,398 Responses
  • neverscared-1

    The W.H.O. really blew it. For some reason, funded largely by the United States, yet very China centric. We will be giving that a good look. Fortunately I rejected their advice on keeping our borders open to China early on. Why did they give us such a faulty recommendation?

    this is from the cheerleader

    so the W.H.0 said its a hoax?

    • their strategy of "lets wait and see, no need to panic yet" really worked.Beeswax
    • https://www.zerohedg…BustySaintClaire
    • zero hedge the breitbard bleedings anus.neverscared
    • W.H.O did also say too much negative about masks.api
    • W.H.O. is still saying that masks make no difference. there's no evidence to say they're wrong.kingsteven
    • https://www.theguard…kingsteven
    • The WHO reviewed its position on masks in light of data from Hong Kong indicating that their widespread use in the community may have reduced the spread...kingsteven
    • There was no evidence that wearing a mask in the community prevented healthy people from picking up respiratory infections including Covid-19, it said.kingsteven
    • ^ from todaykingsteven
    • Yes, what I read of their study in close contact even if you've coverd your mouth/nose the particles still can get in through your eyes.
      Space helmets maybe?
      webazoot

View thread