Punches For:
Out of context: Reply #2047
- Started
- Last post
- 3,472 Responses
- mg332
People who can't edit their photos - and I mean culling down 65 photos of generally the same thing to a more manageable and digestible set of unique photos.
It fits right into a "I gotta go post RIGHT NOW on FB and show you all these pictures from my vacation I took 10 minutes ago and I am so dependent on showing you that I can't even take 20 minutes to select the best photos" annoyance.
I'm literally looking at five sequential photos of the Giants Causeway in Northern Ireland where the only difference per photo are the ocean waves that are 300 yards away from them. Several other scenes from the coast that are the exact same situation. 65 photos that could have been cut down to 12.
My personal rule for photos, at least for my portfolio, is that I edit down to 10 on average, 12 MAX. No duplicates, not even remotely similar photos in that set.
- the most photographed part of the giants causeway is about the size of a football pitch and i have to make a day of it every time we have folks visiting :-|kingsteven
- this isn't even photos of that. They didn't even take the iconic photo everyone tries to take. This was just periphery, at best.mg33
- Honestly, it looked a little rough so maybe those views weren't accessible.mg33
- It’s way worse when you get the same from a pro you’ve hired.Gnash
- Whats "the iconic photo"? I went a few months ago. Interested to know if I got it.Hayzilla
- Hayzilla - IMO it's this: https://www.google.c…mg33
- ^ Photos of the largest portion showing the most dramatic part of the rock formation.mg33
- Ah yea. It was crawling with cunts when I went so didn't really take that many wide angle type shots of the place. Mostly just of my kids sitting on them.Hayzilla
- Just counted. 79 of them LOL.Hayzilla