Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #31477
- Started
- Last post
- 33,769 Responses
- allthethings-5
I consider myself a progressive and was hoping Warren would break through, because I personally think Sanders has got too much baggage to win the general. Where I see a guy who figured out the US's problem 40 years ago, the GOP will easily scare off a majority of the country just by circulating old video of him talking about socialism. He's the right messenger in the sense that he knows what structural changes the US needs, but he's the wrong messenger in basically every other way.
Puts me in kind of a bind...if the last two standing are Bernie and Buttigieg/Klobuchar when my state votes in April, I honestly don't know what I'll do.
Bloomberg, don't even get me started. He's only not the worst because Trump's in the conversation.
- Both sides r corrupt af, but the blatant corruption coming from the Democrat party is next level. Note, Tulsi has not yet bowed out! I'd vote 4 her.robotron3k
- Rob, I think like we talk about different things when we talk about corruptionscruffics
- Both sides!!!inv
- Agree, but when they bump off Bernie for whomever, you'll know the kind of corruption I'm referring too. And it will be happening very very soon.robotron3k
- By the dvs I guess people think the US will embrace the socialist label, huh. I'm really, really scared.allthethings
- Warren was no good. Breaking up tech companies? How is that a good thing for USA?inteliboy