Elon Musk

Out of context: Reply #79

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 2,423 Responses
  • ********
    0

    I love this.

    https://www.marketwatch.com/stor…

    Never not pushing Tesla for hits but nterestingly not mentioning his investment as number 2 or board member in Tesla. It is strange how Tesla of so many companies skirting tariffs and giving up ip and data largely never gets a bafoons Twitter anger. Think now we see why.

    ********
    0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • Oracles Ellison hosting a party for Trump. What’s that got to do with Tesla and Twitter?monospaced
    • He HAS mentioned he is on the Tesla board and is a majority shareholder. It’s not a secret, never has been.monospaced
    • His political actions, as deplorable as they are, aren’t representative of Tesla and therefore do not warrant any backlash against Tesla.monospaced
    • Huh, didn't know. Looks like I'll be selling Oracle. Too bad I didn't see this a few months ago and could have put it in Tesla, but glad I own Tesla too.formed
    • the fact its not mentioned in the article. news plugs tesla at every effort. but now i get it with todays SEC announcement and 2 billion in new stock options
      ********
    • they in trouble
      ********
    • oh well locally panasonic has taken over the the 1/3 of proposed gigafactory and it only cost taxpayers around 170K per job created
      ********
    • I’m baffled as to why you would expect his status of a Tesla board member to be mentioned in an article about throwing a trump fundraiser.monospaced
    • uh tesla is easy click bait and algo traffic. im baffled as to why you think it wouldn't be if not on purpose. that was very specific PR
      ********
    • and yet still quite strange. im not sure if legalities for public traded company officers must make political announcements or what. but the SEC announcement is
      ********
    • interesting and the 2 billion in new funding need through diluting share value at its high. the action completely contradicts the statements. and again
      ********
    • remember the all the talk of gigfactorys in places... the real one is unfinished and no cap ex on anymore and nothing is to that scale.
      ********
    • nothing about that companies finances ad up. and locally info is so much different than mainstream. shit you wont see in headlines
      ********
    • its all highly suspect. do you disagree mono and why?
      ********
    • So you’re seeing their omission of irrelevant data as click bait as a conspiracy? That’s why people here think you’re a fucking idiot.monospaced
    • It is quite relevant.when did the financial interests of the rich garnering political support become irrelevant? haha god the hypocrisy of you.
      ********
    • im like that fuckin teacher thinking i can reason people better but some people are just what they are... but maybe its of the same vein that others think they
      ********
    • can change climate or stop it. a emotional irrational response to trying to better things. when the best approach is to just shrug and say fuck it. your
      ********
    • ignorance to shit may not be wasted time for me. maybe it's a bit of conditioning to remember. like a volcano you act without reason and pure local variables.
      ********
    • surprised its the first time I made the connection. surprised no one else made the observation. but hey thats what posting a bunch of notes is about
      ********
    • lol you’re an idiotmonospaced
    • you can believe whatever makes you feel good mono. nothing can change you, u silly drooling beast
      ********
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread