Politics

Out of context: Reply #31252

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,769 Responses
  • renderedred5

    via @beeswax

    • Lol.
      Just work harder, tramps.
      PhanLo
    • how does growth graph? always the problem with single metrics.
      ********
    • There are no problems with this graph or metrics. What growth are you referring to, and how would it be relevant to the tax rate history?monospaced
    • tax rate vs total tax revenue and job growth and population of course. but than there is also M2 and interest rates
      ********
    • the graph is superfluous by itself just visually showing a tax rate. Unless you are only concerned with visualizing tax rates. which i think only simps would
      ********
    • find interesting to enforce their narrow views
      ********
    • Yeah ... job growth and population is irrelevant though. This is tax rates on wage earning brackets. It shows the rich paying less and less over time.monospaced
    • Whether there are more of them or less makes no difference to the bulk of the population that isn't the 1%. Wages haven't kept up, btw.monospaced
    • So if you use your stupid fuck pea brain, you'll conclude that the rich are getting richer, the regular guy isn't, and taxes aren't helping it. Context enough?monospaced
    • ha yea context shows me why economics is scary when it comes to votes as yours. and reinforces my beliefs on central banking.
      ********
    • ex. explain how wages haven't kept up. by industry by avg, and what in comparison too. inflation? inflation based on CBO or fed?
      ********
    • i think u may see how stupid you are if you actually try to argue your position. not that you would. some tigers dont change stripes
      ********
    • also you should point out specific policies that benefit the rich. you will see most come at the expense of a shrinking middle class
      ********
    • and largely with liberal/democratic adage. you probably think a UAW strike is a good thing, and ignore for every person it negatively effects ~10 people.
      ********
    • you seem to know very little about business and economics or the systems involving them. you are simply a very loud cheerleader on team stuff.
      ********

View thread