Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #31209
- Started
- Last post
- 33,784 Responses
- whatthefunk3
- They are desperate but I understand. They went all in on this loon and started to believe their own lies. Time to wake upscruffics
- Have a vote.PonyBoy
- Happening right now PB. What's going to be the Rs issue with the process next (if it passes)? Too much transparency? Deep state?mathinc
- lol... you keep bringing up that 'deep state' shit... what are you thoughts on the upcoming Horowitz report?PonyBoy
- So... the point of this post is to validate closed sessions by using the whiny voice of people saying public trials are for show. or just show the shit logic********
- being used? Obviously the best result is transparency while knowing the "show" aspect of it will be hyped like that judge crap for ad revenue and ratings and********
- clicks. be great if people understood most news is media. but far worse to use that as an excuse for any transparency. as far as evidence goes it needs to be********
- transparent and able to be checked. anonymous sources from a second hand person not involved... i mean come on. that is not gonna sell********
- especially when you have plenty of testimony from people direct on the non quid pro part which is what its all about... or well about ads i guess so its still********
- gold for a bit********