Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #31022
- Started
- Last post
- 33,768 Responses
- Krassy1
Tulsi didn't make the cut for tonight's debates? Huge mistake on the DNC's part for excluding her.
- wow, just wow.robotron3k
- Why huge mistake?mathinc
- because she and Pete are the only 2 candidates that have a remote shot at taking on TrumpKrassy
- Butti don't stand a chance in hell, one dumb crack like, "Make America fabulous again", he gone after they stop laughing.robotron3k
- but Tulsi, a female combat pilot who went on 2 tours! if she could have gotten better strategist she would have succeeded more.robotron3k
- She'll just go on Tucker for the 18th timeBonSeff
- She should go on Joe RoganKrassy
- oh wait: https://www.youtube.…Krassy
- If you guys love her so much, support her primary opposition for the GOP. Since that's the only side of the political spectrum she gained traction.mathinc
- Krassy missed the recent polls that show Tump losing to every major Dem challenger by double digits. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯mathinc
- don't you think she deserves more support from the DNC? She is being silenced and pushed out (the way Bernie was back in 2016 in order to prop up Hillary)Krassy
- Math, in 2020 will you be voting for Trump or will you be throwing your vote away on a Dem?robotron3k
- @mathinc you do know that all these "polls" are a total joke and absolutely misleading, right? The "pools" in 2016 had Hillary leading Trump by 20 pts. LOL!Krassy
- She also won the popular vote by over 3million votes.BonSeff
- Blame the voters not the DNC. Why aren't more people supporting her if she's good?yuekit
- She only had to get 2% in the polls or something like that in order to make the debate.yuekit
- @BonSeff popular vote is irrelevant when running for president of the Union of ALL statesKrassy
- ...the Electoral Collage protects states like Wyoming (population 1/2 million) up against those like CA (population 40 million)Krassy
- It's not irrelevant when you talk about whether the polls were right though. Because that means she could be a few points ahead in a national poll, andyuekit
- still lose the election (which is exactly what happened).yuekit
- It also depends where people are being polled. Anyhoo, like I said Gabbard is the 2020 Jill Stein of the DNC.BonSeff
- Thank you, yuekit.BonSeff
- The right loves her (because she's more in line with them), and they believe she's getting booted from the debates. They've totally skipped over the partmathinc
- where she hasn't garnered virtually any support from the left. That's NOT what happened to Bernie at all. There has to be a weeding process - she's a weed.mathinc
- Back to my point.. she'd be a way better candidate for you buffoons. But ya'll want to ride the sinking orange turd into battle.mathinc
- At least she doesn't seem to have a brain that's being eaten by worms on the daily.mathinc
- @mathinc calm your tits, dude! "you buffoons" LOL. Easy with the namecalling; it doesn't help your argument one bit. Also, I'm not part of "The right." Chill.Krassy
- The fact she hasn't got the support is telling of the DNC making the same mistake they made last time - supporting the same ol career politicians who will lose!Krassy
- There were some 23 candidates. How would Krassy narrow the field?mathinc
- I already stated my opinion - Pete & Tulsi are the only 2 who have a remote chance up against Trump. Who do you see beating Trump? Biden? Warren? Bernie? NO wayKrassy
- Doesn't Tulsi deserve some of the blame herself though for running kind of a lackluster campaign? She seems to have one issue, don't get into wars.yuekit
- Unfortunately most Americans just don't care that much about foreign policy, especially right now when there is no major war going on.yuekit
- @yuekit yes, agree with you here regarding the lackluster campaign. Regarding the no wars issue, it seemed to be the only question she got during the debatesKrassy
- So Krassy would narrow the field by asking Krassy which candidate he thought could beat Trump. Got it.mathinc
- yes, Krassy has an opinion. Is that OK with you?Krassy