Shooting of the Day
Shooting of the Day
Out of context: Reply #2411
- Started
- Last post
- 2,851 Responses
- Ramanisky22
- hmm only 535 and 302 seem to be a bit off. since they have to deal with private property. i fully support the right of property owner to discriminate freely.********
- they don't like guns they can set the rules on their property. the rest pretty meh. 1143 is a bit like wow you need a rule prohibiting that.********
- to think you need a rule that says its ok to have something no one can see. but plenty of dumb laws out there. just think it be a null point.********
- 1177 another examples.. you grab your shit and leave a disaster site to be charged in a new state with a violation of rules... again you'd hope common sense********
- works but need a new rule. so many rules people lose sight on basic common sense********
- I AM FUCKING SICK OF THIS SHITBonSeff
- #MAGA Nation Uniteutopian
- sick of what bono? ppl dying you dont give a shit about? tired of feeling you need to have feelings?********
- also bon your feelings dont really matter with the context********
- weighing in on this topic with the name 'deathboy' doesn't play well. there is your context, punk.BonSeff
- my handle has nothing to do with the context. just your perception. but yea i get it. its my saggy pants, black skin and swagger********
- gotta except people see some handles and simply jump to conclusions. but if it matters i pulled it from a novel i was reading when i created a gmail account********
- back in like early 2000s. Invite only email... uh what should i make choose... pulled it from the book reading that day. pretty meaningless to me********
- but really bon any thoughts on the rules regulations ram pointed out? Some are public meh, a few i think are better left for individual business to decide********
- hell looking at bill 1387 seems pointless in necessity of any law. but now i question if it hindered private security chasing public dollars********
- Unless there was actually schools wanting to fund more armed security but couldn't because of arbitrary laws... wonder where the truth is on that one********
- hmm only 535 and 302 seem to be a bit off. since they have to deal with private property. i fully support the right of property owner to discriminate freely.
