Climate Change

Out of context: Reply #132

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 602 Responses
  • MrT2

    Deathboy's not alone in saying we may not be the culprits but I wonder if that's just the satisfaction of being contrarian.

    Whether or not we're causing climate change, to use that doubt as justification for more mining and general shit burning, is just wrong IMHO.

    • He is pretty much alone actually...I don't think any credible scientists seriously believe billions of people burning fossil fuels aren't affecting the climate.yuekit
    • OK. I have a mate who’s of this opinion but that’s me exaggerating I guess!MrT
    • jeezus have i ever ever denied climate change or that man is a vector? It's asinine these people talking of stopping climate change.
      ********
    • I merely question the cost vs time and acknowledging every climate data manipulator so far has been pretty wrong on projections of the limited data avaibable
      ********
    • or there choices of using select data and ignoring other on short time frames to guarantee their money for bias. If i seem so wrong in looking at it vs believin
      ********
    • a couple politicians with little knowledge except how to ladder climb can create policy that stops global climate change in its tracks... well fuck all. ill
      ********
    • live under a bridge and hope this salem witch hunt logic passes
      ********
    • OK, I hear ya. But can we agree they still shouldn’t dig up and burn what we’ve got left?MrT
    • i think that kind of decision is not one to be made lightly considering the costs and who they will effect. see what happened in france recently
      ********
    • and im not sure there is legit evidence besides good feelings on the returns of policies which will make the poor even more poor and push more politics in the
      ********
    • direction of a some nut job dictator. I don't have the answer. no one does, but the politicians aiming to get to the top without caring about any of it scaresme
      ********
    • with any proposals you look at costs and effects. 10% in GDP but 25% less for 30K and under, while increasing costs which hit the 30K and under harder for X
      ********
    • amount of years of alteration from natural courses. have you seen any such study? I doubt they exist because that is not what give a shit about
      ********
    • plus be hard as hell to make one with 90% bullshit
      ********

View thread