5G
Out of context: Reply #45
- Started
- Last post
- 89 Responses
- deathboy2
https://www.wired.com/story/why-…
I will admit that i for one have no idea about RF/electro shit. But with that said I think Wired has a few respectable people left post trump and this article strikes me as fair. But it could be Glenn becking me on my lack of knowledge and trying to gaining trust in questioning. However I think the article sources enough that there really isn't any consideration to long term effects. And maybe there are none, but i think it's questionable that pumping a bunch of RF could use some study. Being more of a libertarian I can easily see who would fund such a study and the nature for gov intervention as the only way to "protect" the people, and that its absolutely biased between corporate and gov interests in realtime data all the time.
Theres also interest knowing there is 0 data so jump on oneside of the line and create fear news/content. Regardless of the tech or effects. The point is to get people to feel support or fear. I slightly suspect wired motives of this articles considering others.
But right now i think it is simply to early to know. and there is no definitive answer and all things should be questioned or taken with a grain of salt in this tech. including motives. Set's not right or wrong. There simply is not enough data to form an accurate opinion to me. and yet so many feel they have a real precise opinion? strange