5G

Out of context: Reply #18

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 89 Responses
  • inteliboy17

    You think scientists and engineers are evil? Corporations, telcos, governments... sure... but lab nerds who barely have middle class security, stare at microscopes and data all day, are somehow involved in a big conspiracy?

    Because if this truly was a danger to the human race you'd think we'd be hearing more about it - outside of your fringe news sources.

    I was genuinely intrigued, and down to be proven wrong. But haven't dug up any significant proof that 5G is dangerous. Though I guess if there is even a smell something is off, then an independent report needs to be done.

    • Jesus, you're fast exposing yourself to be one of the lesser intelligent members here.set
    • Which is rather ironic, given your username.set
    • Yeah good response you smug twat.inteliboy
    • Funny because I was actually interested, and looking to know more... But I forgot you're a cunt. Always have been, always will be.inteliboy
    • Ah I see, so because the information comes from someone you think is a cunt, you blindly disregard it. How very intelligent.set
    • I was interested to know more as part of a thread on a website I like visiting, via diving in as a sceptic.inteliboy
    • though I guess that's a lesser intelligent thing to do for such an intellect as yourself.inteliboy
    • I apologise I know I'm rather abrupt, but you just said that you can't find any evidence that 5G is bad for us. Sorry fella but that's ridiculous.set
    • I never said that the scientists and engineers are evil. The ones giving the orders at the top are the ones corrupted by evil. Everyone else is just doing...set
    • ... their job. Getting paid. Plus information is compartmentalised a lot of the time so no one has the full picture.set
    • It's like saying everyone that works for the tobacco industry is evil. Of course not.set
    • Or everyone in the farming industry that sprays poison on to our food is evil. Of course not. That doesn't mean the poison isn't real.set
    • true, that's a good way of putting it.inteliboy
    • Have a great day mateset
    • Thanks for letting us know set mate!. Didn’t THEY suggest that mobiles give us brain cancer but they don’t?Ianbolton
    • https://www.telegrap…set
    • https://www.independ…set
    • https://amp.cnn.com/…set
    • Sorry 'mate' but what planet are you living on?set
    • " ionizing radiation, especially from X-rays used in CT scans, has the most "supportive evidence" as a possible factor behind the rise in glioblastoma diagnosesmonospaced
    • “The exposures used in the studies cannot be compared directly to the exposure that humans experience when using a cell phone,”monospaced
    • Interesting snippets from those links. Not arguing against you or challenging, just exploring what you shared :)monospaced
    • Guys, guys, let's keep it classy.Maaku

View thread