Politics

Out of context: Reply #30705

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,768 Responses
  • Ramanisky20

    • that was painful. they're just grasping at straws nowGnash
    • How so? He clearly is evading a number of questions.wordssssss
    • it's like playing chess with pigeon: it will just shit on your board and fly away.zaq
    • what is there to evade? they released the entire report... not to mention—is someone gonna ask something about Russia? What about Russia guyz? Russia? RUSSIA?!!PonyBoy
    • but seriously though—what happened to all the Russia talk? Now it's obstruction? Obstruction of what?—there was no crime—what did he obstruct? zzzzzzPonyBoy
    • Desperate Leftrobotron3k
    • kamala's all "gotcha!" - it's so cringeGnash
    • obstruction of justice is irrespective of whether there was a crime committed.dorf
    • They go hand in hand, dorf. One doesn’t exist without the other. At best a desperate attempt to hold on to something given the main narrative of Russia is BSPonyBoy
    • of course one can exist without the othermonospaced
    • not if there's nothing to obstruct... but you keep running w/that ;)PonyBoy
    • and what they're using as examples of obstruction (eg-Trump joking about HIllary's emails during a speech etc)... weak at best.PonyBoy
    • But again... let's stay on topic... please— tell me about Russia. :)PonyBoy
    • https://pbs.twimg.co…Gnash
    • allegations can be false and you can still obstruct. whether you think the investigation is valid or not is moot.dorf

View thread