Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #30660
- Started
- Last post
- 33,769 Responses
- mathinc2
Pony, Robocunt (can't see you anyways, so nm), freedom, Boz...
After reading the Muller Report, I'd love to hear what you think. This looks terrible for yer boi. Maybe it's not criminal, but after reading the obstruction (Vol 2) section.. how can you -- as an adult -- read this and support this president? How can you watch him say, "Oh the fake news is awful." While he directed lie upon lie. The press got most shit right, despite the administration smoke screening and lying.
- To them, as long as it’s not criminal it’s acceptable.monospaced
- And they think Mueller and the FBI are engaged in a Deep State conspiracy.allthethings
- when I have ever supported this guy, tommy? If you think shitting on the left and calling them morons for hanging on to the RUSSIA COLLUSION hoax...PonyBoy
- for 2+ years makes me a supporter of the orange turd then you (along w/many other fucks on this site) have selective reading skillsPonyBoy
- You go ahead though and get 'hung up' on how you now how info that makes the man look like a tool (wait... we have that everyday) even though...PonyBoy
- ... the point of the investigation was about RUSSIAN COLLUSION (stay on topic guys). You look like fools. There was nothing there... and what's worse...PonyBoy
- ... is the fuckholes who pushed for the FISA court to provide spying (I'm sorry—'surveillance... are about to be in some serious trouble.PonyBoy
- Learn to lose w/grace... you won't look so stupid when you're left trying to hold on to SOMETHING from a wasteful investigation like this one...PonyBoy
- ... Obstruction? Of what? There was no crime in the end. The left just continues to look stupid... gimmie more of that Nadler fuck... wow, what a tool.PonyBoy
- Russian COLLUSION, tommy... prove that... not obstruction of a NON-crime. You might get me on your side of thinking then.PonyBoy
- It's weird how you "don't like the guy" but parrot all of his talking points. So excuse me for thinking you're FOR him when you expect the FBI to ignoremathinc
- when Carter Page is dealing with Russians.. and involved with a US campaign. Totally valid to call that spying on a campaign. You know what.. if you don't wantmathinc
- the FBI looking into people on your campaign, then don't staff it full of RU stooges. Pretty simple.mathinc
- And re collusion, I guess you didn't read the report? Or do you get your news from the same place that's talking up all that SPYING the DEEP STATE did?mathinc
- If you take Barr's summary as the final word, then sure, there was nothing going on there between RU-Trump. Maybe read it and then see if you have amathinc
- problem with how that campaign ran in terms of its interactions with RU?mathinc
- If Hillary, or anyone else was feeding a foreign power polling data and info, and that country unleashed their bot farms to subvert the election.. I'd want thatmathinc
- person in jail. I guess ignoring those actions is what's called 'losing with grace'.mathinc
- Big Picture: You now know Trump isn't a Russian puppet—he was not placed in office by Putin. THAT has been the bullshit drivel for 2+ years.PonyBoy
- to say there was "nothing there" is extremely naive, as there was obviously something, despite it not bringing strict criminal chargesmonospaced
- Now we'll spend the next 2 years investigating obstruction of a non-crime. Orange Man BAAAAD!! Must get him no matter what!! Grow up.PonyBoy
- Ugh, even if it's not criminal, defending ANY of this is as deplorable as what actually is happening in the whitehouse. It's all despicable.monospaced
- I've never thought he was a puppet as much as a useful idiot. They did find facts related to collusion and a lot more for obstruction. Why you can'tmathinc
- Guys... where did Christopher Steele get his info for the Dossier that started it all? What did he himself say about his ability to verify the info?PonyBoy
- acknowledge that orange man isn't fit for office is your business. I do.mathinc
- To just brush off this behavior as if it's in any way acceptable for a standing president just feels wrong, and downright unamerican.monospaced
- That fuckcing Dossier is what was used (and not explained) to put the FISA court in action. You feel good about that?PonyBoy
- The dossier isn't where this started. I mean, seriously.. where the fuck are you getting your news?mathinc
- Tommy... whether or not I 'acknowledge that orange man isn't fit for office' means NOTHING. Vote him out. He was lawfully elected and the left is doing...PonyBoy
- ... nothing to prove him worthy of impeachment and instead look like fools clinging on to bullshit. Keep this shit up and bet he's voted in again.PonyBoy
- *I betPonyBoy
- Also, what exactly has he done to help protect the elections.. answer that.mathinc
- And I've asked this more than once already - please don't call me out in these threads - if I feel like participating in your conversation I will...PonyBoy
- ... <3PonyBoy
- I'll do whatever I fucking please.
:Pmathinc - "The dossier isn't where this started." Really? Where'd the FISA court get their info from that started the 'surveillance'?PonyBoy
- lol... you do what you 'fucking please', junior... :P
btw... when you coming down here so I can buy you a beer? (maybe I should come up there?) :)PonyBoy - And I think I called you a 'fuck' somewhere back in those notes... you know I have nothing but love for you, tom (and mono... <3 you both).PonyBoy
- It 'all started' with Papadopolos (sp?). Devin Nunes confirmed that one a year ago when he did that whole memo backfire stunt.mathinc
- The FACTS haven't stopped people from the GOP from continuously acting like it was the dossier though. And even if it was the dossier.. Steele is a respectedmathinc
- expert on RU. I understand the dossier played a part in things. But papa started it. Facts get in the way of the GOP/Trump narrative though.mathinc
- And I got nothing but <3 for you too. The fact that you're a red hat MAGA Fuckboy hasn't diminished that. I don't seem to have your #, you got mine?mathinc
- Papadopblahblah was approached... he didn't make first contact (there was mass outreach to the Trump campaign by the Russians - not the reverse)PonyBoy
- It went nowhere... wikileaks released Hillz emails so Papa had nothing anyway and didn't need to lie like he did (only served 12 days so wasn't 'that' bad)PonyBoy
- Steele seems like a good guy... he (under oath I believe) said he couldn't confirm the info... and yet that info became the basis for FISA warrants... crazy.PonyBoy
- And listen here ya red commie elitist... yeah... I think I have your number still... hold on... let me send you a loving text.PonyBoy
- That's all speculation. You don't know what they used for FISA. Carter Page is a total fuckup, and it seems he was legit trying to get on RUs good side.mathinc
- Who knows what that dude did to get surveilled. I feel 100% this is going to blow up in Trump/Barr face. None of it adds up to 'spying.'mathinc
- Holy shit you read 400 pages?! And here I figure journalist read it for news and push out findings and still haven't seen any idea of russian collusion********
- surprisingly math you didn't even state finding based on your reaction to engage. personally for me that is red flag you are simply signaling********
- from the comments it looks like focus on the piss gate dossier, the one even MSM after reveling in have tried to forget and scrub mention of.********
- and seriously you blocked people you don't want to see? Progress that convenient formula. Much like facebook algos try to decide. World is better in strife of********
- opinion. diversity in opinion is same as genetics so you don't constantly fuck your own daughter. or as picasso said about copying********
- oneself. its embarassing. read the comments and respond accordingly if you feel the need. a very important necessity if you dont want to create feedback loops********
- and bubble information necessary for capitalism or larger development in the real world********
- 1st: Robo has been on QBN for the last 10+ years with 100+ screen names.. fake polish girlfriends.. and has stirred shit the entire time. His 'view' ismathinc
- not something I'm interested in because he is legitimately a disturbed person. 2nd: Of course I didn't read the entire document, but I did read about 10% of itmathinc
- yesterday. Mostly jumping to topics I thought interesting.mathinc
- huh robo is that true? He seemed always the same views to me, never multiple accounts. not that i look super hard********
- when you jump to topics are worried about only looking for confirmation bias?********
- by jump to topics i meant the 10% you chose that is. Clarify since topics is my defined nomenclature to what you read.********